[ad_1]
Avengers: End of the game is in the rooms now, and we have some questions. Some of them are foolish and easy enough to fear for a "meh" and a shrug, but most of them are heavier and worth asking. Well, it's worth asking for us anyway. And look, I understand. The answers to each of the questions below can probably be summed up by one of the following answers: "This is a Hunter cartoon movie!" Or "Close your pie hunter!"
But putting that aside, a useless answer for the moment, we ask for answers! Of course, all this is accompanied by a warning spoiler …
Where is Loki going with the Tesseract?
One of Endgame's highlights is the Infinity's series of stone-grabbing attempts, but their attempt to steal the Tesseract while he and Loki are escorted by SHIELD at the end of the New York Battle bursts into shenanigans. Seeing the occasion, Loki catches the Tesseract and disappears – so where is he going? In the end, he went to Disney + for a new series that is expected to debut on the streaming service in the near future. This is the legitimate answer, but it does not explain where he went in the film world. After being captured in The Avengers (2011) his next appearance in the MCU is in Thor: The World of Darkness (2013) where he was forced to answer Asgard for his crimes on Earth. It still happens thanks to End of Game"Take time travel safely – changing the past does not affect the present!" – but Loki is the kind of trickster who might come to Asgard to escape and steal the Tesseract (in this timeline) before it is given to The Collector. This means that yes, he could have two Tesseracts, which is more power than someone like him should have. (This in turn is the worry that someone can travel back in time and collect dozens of * each * infinity stone … imagine a glove with 72 stones!)
How flexible is the rule of the stone of soul?
According to the guardian of the stone of soul, it can only be obtained by someone who sacrifices someone whom he likes. In War of Infinity it meant that Thanos could throw Gamora to his death and be rewarded, but in End of Game the rules seem to change. Of course, Hawkeye loves Black Widow – all heroes like Black Widow, apparently – and that she likes him, but love? At best, they feel the platonic love of friendship for each other, otherwise the meeting with Hawkeye's family is severely emotional. But hey, let's say friendship is enough. We are still stuck on the rule that someone must sacrifice someone else. These two friends are fighting for the right to sacrifice themselves and to do the same to each other. Hawkeye does not sacrifice Black Widow … he does not stop him from sacrificing himself.
Did Steve Rogers spend sixty years hiding and / or pretending he is not Captain America?
Captain America returns the various Infinity stones – a sequence that we do not see but which I imagine would have been ten times harder to accomplish than flying – and instead of returning to the present, it remains in the 1940s. Another question: None of the stones were in the 40s so how did he get back there? All right, I'm basing myself on the stage where he and Peggy Carter are dancing to the sound of the music at midlife while wearing midlife clothes that could have gone back on a theme dance party, but still …) That means that he spent the decades leading up to his discovery by the SHIELD and over the past ten years of adventures. Has he spent some of his time performing heroic deeds? He should do it because he is not the type to hide while people are suffering. If so, will Nick Fury and SHIELD not know it sooner? I know that Chris Evans has finished with the character, but maybe he could be tempted to return to the adventure for a punctual adventure against villains in the 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s. (The 1990s already have a Captain America.)
Does not the presence of Steve Rogers as an old man suggest that traveling back in time * can * affect the present?
End of Game puts a point of honor in belittling and harassing beautiful examples of time travel movies as Back to the future (1985) and Timecop (1994) arguing that changes to the past can not affect the present. But the appearance of the old man Steve Rogers on this bench suggests the opposite. Instead of coming back using the machine, he stayed in the 40s and lived all his life. That changed Peggy Carter's life and chances are they even had kids. (A super-powerful girl who takes over from Captain America when she turns 21? Hmm? Kevin Feige, call me …) It also means that Peggy's grand-niece, Sharon, would have grown up knowing who he was and l & # 39; caller. Uncle Steve (which means that she probably would not have done it with him either). The point being, the present would be changed.
Why does Thanos seem even stronger without the Infinity stones than he did with them?
Towards the end of War of Infinity A handful of Avengers manage to almost remove his glove and defeat Thanos even as he wields the stones of the Infinite. They obviously fail because of Peter "Star-Lord" Quill's dipshit, but they approach it. So, why can not they even scratch Thanos in End of Game when he has no stones to strengthen it? Captain America, Thor and Captain Marvel – they are incredibly strong beings resembling divine beings, but they are all hit on the back by Thanos who uses barely more than his fists. It's just about anything. It's also probably my own pet peeve with these movies, but the fluctuation of powers is just ridiculous and often lazy, because the characters are as strong or as weak as they should be depending on the scene. For example, seeing Captain America lift Thor's hammer is great – it's worth it! – But he also knows how to shoot with lightning ?!
[ad_2]
Source link