[ad_1]
The entire Democratic Party is driven by race, sex, sexuality and social justice. Everyone inside and outside is assessed on an ever-changing grievance scale called "intersectionality". It is therefore quite natural that his first big presidential candidate, openly homosexual, be accused of not having suffered enough in life to justify the attention he receives.
Antjuan Seawright, a South Carolina-based Democratic strategist, groaned at Politico because the media was spending too much air time and printing on South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg, a homosexual who , apparently, has not apparently suffered merit publicity.
"[Some] Democrats see Buttigieg's rise as a reflection of deep-seated racial and sexual prejudices, namely that Buttigieg's bump would be impossible if he was not a white man, the Politico report said. Seawright said: "What people tell me is that they see the privilege par excellence."
Seawright brilliantly played the "Privilege" card, designed to end the round and advance the most oppressed player, perhaps a black or female primary student by 2020. (By the way, never ask how is determined who is more oppressed than who, because there is no logic to that – it's decided on a whim.)
But even if the national media is also governed by social justice, they must work within the normal boundaries of the information sector. At the moment, a candidate like Senator Cory Booker, D-N.J., Who is black, is an old news. He has been on the national scene since 2012, when he started doing stunts and tweeting rather than dealing with policy issues as Mayor of Newark, N.J.
Booker had an interview in "The Ellen DeGeneres Show". He had the impression profile sticky-sweet. He had the glossy treatment of New York Magazine.
Booker and the rest of the Democratic Party's claims group can relax about their temporary darkness. Buttigieg will not always be new. Everyone is getting older. Just ask Beto O'Rourke.
[[[[Read more: Buttigieg's husband's brother: "I can not stand the gay lifestyle"
[ad_2]
Source link