Trump Strikes Mulvaney for Doubting the Chances of an Infrastructure Contract

by



[ad_1]

President TrumpDonald John TrumpThe Irish Prime Minister says the protests are "authorized" and "welcome" for Trump Gabbard's visit: the United States should not go to war with Iran Bullock opens his candidacy for the Iowa by introducing rural references PLUS in a new interview chided interim chief of staff Mick MulvaneyJohn (Mick) Michael MulvaneyPelosi and Schumer are expected to meet with Trump for a second round of discussions on infrastructure. A consumer bureau official at the center of a racial controversy will leave the head of the Trump agency, which has spurred the fury of racial commentary. to throw cold water on the chances of concluding an infrastructure deal with Democrats.

In an interview for "The Next Revolution" on Fox News, host Steve Hilton pointed out that Mulvaney's skeptical comments coincided with a meeting that took place late last month between Democratic leaders and Trump at the White House.

"If Mick Mulvaney said that, then he's not allowed to say it," Trump said. "He told me it was not, and he did not want it, he said it would be difficult to finance."

Mulvaney was interviewed last month at a conference organized by the Milken Institute in California on the prospects of realizing a set of infrastructure.

"Do I think there is an interest in doing this?" Yes, do I think there is probably more interest, especially from the Democrats, in making a show to try to to make an agreement, yeah, "said Mulvaney.

Mulvaney said he had expressed reservations with Trump about the viability of an infrastructure deal bearing fruit before he left his post. He mentioned government regulations that lengthen the process and said that Democrats would not be willing to eliminate these rules.

Trump told Hilton in an interview broadcast Sunday night that he still wanted to work on infrastructure. But the president himself has expressed his fear that the Democrats will trap him.

"I also think the Democrats play us a little bit," he said. "You know, I think what they want me to do is to say," What we will do is raise taxes, "and we will do this and this and that and that, then they will hold a press conference, see, Trump wants to raise taxes, so it's a bit of a game. "

Democratic legislators and Trump decided at the end of last month's meeting to set up a $ 2 trillion infrastructure package.

Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy Patricia's Alesandro Pelosi Deadly Dead Drummer: "The pace of nature is dying because we are killing the Earth" Night Defense: Congressional leaders receive a classified briefing on the Iran; Trump on war: "I hope not" | Key Republican appeals credible threats | Warren's plan targets Pentagon's influence The Memo: Trump's new immigration plan finds few friends (D-Calif.) And Leader of the Senate Minority Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis Schumer & Joe SleepyCreepy & # 39; Crazy Bernie: Trump seeks to define 2020 Dems with insults. The conversation about the infrastructure must include the lands and public waters of the United States. (D-N.Y.) Must visit the White House next week for a follow-up meeting to discuss how to fund the proposal. It is not clear if other lawmakers, including Republicans, will be present.

A vast infrastructure package was considered one of the few areas in which Democrats and the White House could find common ground, but members of both parties expressed some concern about the prospect of such agreement.

Congressional Republicans have indicated that they are unlikely to support a basket of infrastructure that would cost so much unless they reach an agreement on how to pay without increasing the deficit.

Some Democrats wondered whether it was worth giving Trump a victory over the infrastructure when the president blurred the supervision efforts of the investigations. Other party members have claimed that the Democratic-controlled House should introduce an infrastructure bill, regardless of White House membership, and put pressure on Republicans to ensure that They act.

[ad_2]

Source link