Trump accidentally explains how much the ban on Huawei is stupid – BGR



[ad_1]

Anyone who follows the trade war between Trump and China can not say that the import ban Huawei has been a huge surprise. We have already seen this happen with ZTE, which had been hit by a similar order preventing it from buying hardware and software products from US companies. It is now Huawei's turn to proceed in the same way. Huawei's trading partners that have temporarily broken ties with the Chinese conglomerate include US and international technology companies, including big names such as Google, Microsoft, Intel and ARM. The ban not only harms Huawei, it also affects the financial performance of companies that have been forced to suspend their relationship with Huawei, pending a new decision from the US government. It's unclear how long the whole process will last, but Trump just made a strange statement about it.

After announcing to the press a $ 16 billion aid program for farmers affected by the trade war with China, Trump answered a reporter's question about Huawei – a video is underway C-SPAN (via The edge):

TRUMP: Huawei is something very dangerous. You look at what they did from a security point of view, from the military point of view, it's very dangerous. So it is possible that Huawei is even included in some kind of trade agreement. If we reached an agreement, I could imagine that Huawei could be included, in one form or another, in a trade agreement.

JOURNALIST: What would it look like?

TRUMP: That would seem very good for us.

DIARY: But the Huawei part, how do you conceive this.

TRUMP: Oh, it's too early to say. We are very concerned about Huawei from a security point of view.

The problem with this answer is that Trump says that Huawei is both very dangerous but also an asset in the trade war with China. So what is it? Is it "something very dangerous", in which case it should perhaps not be included in any commercial agreement at the moment? Or is Huawei simply a big pawn in these complex trade negotiations, in which case the security concerns have obviously been exaggerated to achieve this goal?

Can it be both? Not really, and the whole thing would be very disturbing. If Huawei is indeed the security risk that the Trump administration has described as such, but that Trump eventually include it in a trade deal with China in the near future, then what is it? what does all this mean? How would this "look good" for the United States?

Here again, it's Trump who says things out loud, and everything the president says is not real or makes sense.

Image Source: Alex Brandon / AP / Shutterstock

[ad_2]

Source link