A month later, no action is taken regarding Tyreek Hill – ProFootballTalk



[ad_1]

Getty Images

Last night, a month had passed since the release of the disturbing sound containing not only a discussion on whether the receiver of Tyreek Hill Chiefs had broken the arm of his three-year-old son, but also: ) an argument with the boy's mother to find out if he is "terrified" of Hill; and (2) a frightening reply from Hill, in which he says, "You must be terrified of me too, bitch."

The chiefs took no further action and, beyond a multitude of comments that conveyed the same message (they are "deeply disturbed" by the audio) as a result of the l & # 39; Emergence of audio and rapid decision of the team to keep it away training sessions.

The league had not said anything about Hill, and she would probably have remained quiet publicly had Commissioner Roger Goodell not been questioned about Hill at Goodell's traditional press conference at the end of each meeting. of ownership. The somewhat confusing comments of Goodell (he suggested at one point that the league needed a "permission" to speak to Hill, which is clearly not the case) sent a clear message : the league will do nothing until the investigation that was closed the day before the audio release that was reopened immediately after has been resolved, in a manner or a other.

But no one knows when the reopened investigation will end. The Johnson County Attorney in Kansas has publicly said nothing and has done nothing since the end of the investigation, as there is insufficient evidence to determine who committed the crime against Hill's son. , has been relaunched.

The vague status of the situation creates a scheduling problem for the leaders and the league. If the investigation quietly persists in the training camp, will Hill be allowed to show up? Apparently, this will be the case, even if he has not been arrested or charged yet.

At some point, the NFL will have to place Hill on the list of excluded commissioners, which means that chiefs will have to pay his salary of $ 1.965 million, even if he does not play. (This may seem unfair to the team, but it's a much better financial result than if they had it signed to a long-term mega deal before these events occurred.)

The league's position on Hill ("we will not even talk to him while the investigation is underway") gives Kansas prosecutors significant power over Hill. If they hang around indefinitely, the league will apparently distance them from the sport, indefinitely.

This uncomfortable position highlights one of the problems associated with the application of personal conduct policy. Since the league generally refrains from interfering in ongoing police investigations, there will be situations in which potential allegations – even if they are not actually brought against the player – are serious enough to bring the league to prohibit the player from playing during the course of the investigation, no matter how long the investigation may take.

In theory, the league could conduct investigations into possible violations of personal conduct policy unrelated to child abuse. For example, Hill's comments to Crystal Espinal could be the type of "threat of violence" that justifies a sanction. But it is possible that these comments are currently part of an expanded police investigation into whether and to what extent Hill will be charged.

While the league waits for the end of the investigation, it must also be ready to act quickly if the police force abruptly ends its work without accusations against Hill. At this point, the league will have to conduct its own investigation and impose a punishment. The clock is still going strong for the start of training camp and the first week of the 100th NFL season.

[ad_2]

Source link