Rule of "religious conscience" for health care providers

by



[ad_1]

In a complaint filed Tuesday, the groups argue that if the rule were to come into effect, it would "encourage health professionals to deny medical treatment to patients because of their personal religious or moral beliefs".
Supreme Court leaves intact blocking of abortion restriction in Indiana, but allows fetal burial

"The rule is intentionally impracticable for health facilities, including hospitals, and could cause these facilities to completely eliminate LGBTQ reproductive services and services in order to avoid losing public funds," the complainants said. in a statement.

Richard B. Katskee, legal director of plaintiff Americans United for the separation of church and state, said the rule was "unconstitutional in at least four respects" – including violating the clause of Equality of protection by targeting marginalized communities.

Geneviève Scott, senior counsel at the Center for Reproduction Rights, said the rule is "intentionally confusing and unworkable".

"Even paramedics and administrative staff are encouraged to refuse care," she said. "The rule is extremely broad and in no way limits the risk of being denied treatment, even for those in need of emergency care."

Other complainants include the Center for Reproductive Rights, Lambda Legal, LGBT clinics and Santa Clara County, California.

When the final rule was released earlier this month, the Civil Rights Bureau of the Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement that it was replacing one of 2011 that he was considering " insufficient".

The administration says the rule will protect individuals and health entities from unwanted involvement in services such as abortion, sterilization or assisted suicide. The rule, according to the office, restores the existing protections created by Congress.

The final rule also states that complaints to the office about gender dysphoria-related surgeries will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

The final rule of the HHS led to the immediate condemnation of several civil and reproductive rights groups when it was published. They warned that people seeking reproductive care could lose, as did members of the LGBTQ community. They said that the idea of ​​religious freedom is used to justify harming communities and putting lives at risk, and will harm the health of women and transgender patients.

Vogue's Ariane and Jessica Ravitz contributed to this report.

[ad_2]

Source link