[ad_1]
The domination of the three great tennis players – Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic – in the Grand Slam tournaments has been a mesmerizing scenario for almost 10 years. But at the French Open, a player has been writing a predictably predictable series for a longer time.
Throughout the Open tennis, the Open de France was considered the slam of breakthroughs. Paris often gave players the opportunity to exchange supporting roles for an audition in order to land the main hero. Big names such as Bjorn Borg and Ivan Lendl, connoisseurs of the clay, Guillermo Vilas and Gustavo Kuerten, the wonders of Yannick Noah and Gaston Gaudio, Roland Garros has embraced diversity in the representation of his champion character.
When Nadal raised his first Musketeers Cup in 2005, he became the 21st man out of 49 to clinch his first major at Roland Garros. At that time, the Open de France accounted for 42.86% of the top ATP champions. The second closest, the US Open, had less than half, with 20.41% (10 players), followed by the Australian Open and Wimbledon with 18.37% each (9 players) .
Since 2005, Nadal has produced the executive of French Open viewers, with eleven titles in 14 years, a blank 11-0 record in championship games and only two losses along the way. Federer, Djokovic and Stan Wawrinka each delivered memorable performances to attract attention at one point in the show, but for the majority of the time spent on the screen, it is exclusively Nadal.
If you remove the Spaniard from the presidency of the director, Federer and Djokovic each have convincing arguments in favor of many additions to their main account: they cumulate a score of 1 to 11 during the event against Nadal, including a brand from 0 to 6 in the matches for the title. But one can argue that everyone that Nadal took during the second week in Paris has a valid claim, because the story of the tape brings to light another distinctive story that the eleven-time champion has cut into the editing room.
On four occasions, Roland-Garros has recorded at least three consecutive victories in breakthroughs and history has never taken more than five years to repeat itself: 1982-1984 (Mats Wilander, Noah and Lendl) ; 1989-91 (Michael Chang, Andres Gomez and Jim Courier); 1995-1998 (Thomas Muster, Yevgeny Kafelnikov, Kuerten and Carlos Moya); and 2002-05 (Albert Costa, Juan Carlos Ferrero, Gaudio and Nadal). The only other time this happened at a major was at the Australian Open, in 1976 (Mark Edmundson), in January 1977 (Roscoe Tanner) and in December 1977 (Vitas Gerulaitis). ).
Retired compatriots David Ferrer and Nicolas Almagro have two of the strongest petitions, including Ferrer, who has hung up his racket in Madrid this month. The former world number 3 has dropped four times to Nadal in the quarterfinals or later to Roland Garros, including in the 2013 final. Almagro was sent three times in the quarterfinals by the southpaw in 2008-2012.
This season marks the 14th anniversary of Nadal's launch of his first episode of a series of 11 episodes. The public eagerly awaits to know if it is renewed, whether Djokovic or Federer is restarted, or whether an evolving project such as Dominic Thiem is green.
Note: In 2005, Roland-Garros also dominated the winners of the women's breakthroughs with 38.71% (12 players out of 31). The Australian Open ranked second with 22.58% (7 players), Wimbledon and the US Open tied with 19.35% (6 players). Since then, the Open de France is in pole position with six of the first 17 editions of the charts for the first time, just ahead of the US Open, which has five.
[ad_2]
Source link