[ad_1]
Joe Biden's presidential campaign has raised non-credit language, sometimes word for word, when he developed his plans for education and climate, incidents that the campaign inadvertently recognized and qualified.
The incidents seemed to be errors on the part of the staff when they detailed Biden's policies and underlined how his campaign was trying to formulate specific proposals. But the question was particularly sensitive for Biden, whose campaign of 1988 had been disappointed after having plagiarized, in speeches, a rhetoric used by the British politician Neil Kinnock.
According to reports, he would have used lines of two Democrats, Robert F. Kennedy and Hubert H. Humphrey, without assigning them. Biden had also been cited for plagiarism in an article while studying law, an error he had blamed for not knowing how to correctly cite sources. He left the campaign shortly after many cases of use were reported.
The Biden campaign announced Tuesday that it would update its online political plans to correctly allocate information sources, which, in the case of its environmental plan, included an entity from the coal industry. But the controversy nevertheless threatened to overshadow the policies themselves – and, for some liberal supporters, it was a sign that policies were not being taken seriously by the campaign or the candidate.
"Biden seems to take ideas from others and not give credit. You can not do that, "said Leah Stokes, a political scientist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, specializing in climate issues. "It's all about spending a sleepless night and reading your friend's essay."
Other campaigns have used unassigned language similar to that created by primary sources. Senator Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) Said in her plan that "black women are three to four times more likely to die of pregnancy-related causes than white women". This is identical to a reference in American Heart Document Association, which assigns statistics to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "It's a statistic," campaign spokesman Ian Sams said when asked to comment.
In the case of his education policy, Biden used a phrase word for word from a publication on the education policy of the XQ Institute group.
"Students who participate in high-quality technical and vocational education are more likely to graduate, to acquire vocational skills, to enroll in university, to obtain employment rates and to higher incomes, "reads the sentence.
The institute did not immediately respond to requests for comment and the Biden campaign refused a request for comment on Education Policy passage. After the Washington Post contacted the campaign about the sentence, he added a link to the institute's publication.
The use of other groups' words in Biden's environmental plan became known after Josh Nelson of the progressive CREDO group noticed on Tuesday that most of its terms on sequestering carbon capture appeared to be topics of discussion. pro-industrial groups.
Nelson found that the sentences were almost identical to the wording used by the Coalition for Carbon Capture, whose members include Shell, Peabody Energy and Arch Coal.
Biden's climate plan calls for carbon capture, use and storage to be a "widely available, cost-effective and rapidly scalable solution to reduce carbon emissions and achieve mid-century climate goals".
On its website, the Carbon Capture Coalition of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions states that "its goal is to make carbon capture, use and storage a widely available, cost-effective and rapidly scalable solution for to reduce the emissions of d climatic objectives of the century. "
"This is certainly not a good sign for a Democratic presidential candidate to copy things textually from a group associated with the coal industry," Nelson said.
Alec Gerlach, communications director of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, said he was not coordinating his campaigns. But he added that "carbon capture should be an essential part of any global strategy to eliminate carbon emissions".
At least one environmental group does not have the trouble of seeing its ideas influence the hopes of the White House.
In his climate plan, for example, the Biden camp copied a factoid – "the average US sewer line is 33 years old, with many pipes dating back 50 or even 100 years" – from the website of American Rivers in a section on Water Infrastructure.
But Amy Kober, a spokesperson for American Rivers' own water defense group, said her organization was "absolutely happy to see anyone visiting our website".
"Our information is available for all campaigns," she added.
[ad_2]
Source link