Jerry Nadler: Justice Department Signs Agreement With House Democrats After Mueller Report

by



[ad_1]

But, as a result of the agreement reached between the committee and the Department of Justice, it appears that a court fight is no longer necessary for Mr. Barr's summons to appear. The details of the documents that would be provided to the committee were not disclosed, but Nadler said that the agreement would allow all members of the Judiciary Committee to see "Robert Mueller's most important files …" providing us with key evidence that the special advocate used to determine whether the president and others obstructed justice or engaged in another misconduct. "

"These documents will enable us to fulfill our constitutional obligations and decide on the follow-up to be given to the charges brought against the President by the Special Council," Nadler said.

The Judiciary Committee of the House issued a subpoena for Mueller's unredacted report and all the evidence of the special advocate, and then voted for Barr to be found guilty of contempt of court. last month. The committee also quarreled with Barr over the format of his hearing, prompting the Attorney General to waive his appearance.

In a letter last month, Nadler said he wanted to negotiate on the scope of the subpoena and accept a smaller subset of documents from Mueller's testimony, including summaries of key hearings with witnesses provided by the FBI. The Department of Justice responded that it would also be willing to negotiate as long as the House would cancel its vote for contempt of Barr.

Nadler said in his statement that he "would keep the criminal contempt process pending for the time being" as a result of the agreement. But Democrats in the House did not vote Tuesday on a quote for criminal contempt against Barr. They drafted a resolution to seize the courts as part of the so-called civil contempt process to enforce their Barr and McGahn subpoenas.

Nadler said the vote would still take place Tuesday, noting that the resolution also included wording allowing for a lawsuit against McGahn.

He added that as long as the Ministry of Justice "would proceed in good faith", no further action would be taken against Barr, but he added: "If important information is withheld, we will not have to. alternative to enforcing our subpoena in court and considering other remedies. "

CNN solicited comments from the Department of Justice.

Laura Jarrett from CNN contributed to this report.

[ad_2]

Source link