[ad_1]
AP
The Raiders think the time has come for Antonio Brown to go to Schutt or get out of the pot. As his agent explained, Antonio Brown does not think the time has come to choose a new helmet and move on – or away from the match.
"We have worked very closely with the Raiders, and we will continue to work very closely with the Raiders," said agent Drew Rosenhaus on Sunday night during an appearance at the WSVN-TV channel. "I'm not sure we agree to have exhausted all optionsas [Raiders G.M.] Mike Mayock said. But there is no doubt that the process is still going on. We try to work with the team and the league and the union to find a solution. We have not understood it yet. To say that AB is upset by the decision not to let him wear his helmet is accurate, but we still treat him and detect him. I would not want to do too much for him not to be here today, as much as we always try to find a solution that works for everyone. "
From the point of view of the team and the league, the only viable solution seems to be to choose a helmet model from the menu of eligible helmets. What other options allow Brown to continue to wear a Schutt AiR advantage?
At this point, the best (and perhaps the only) alternative would be the filing of a new grievance challenging both the decision to speed up the Schutt AiR benefit test in order to create this full-face helmet model, which had not been previously banned by the league, a banned helmet model and the decision not to give Brown a one-year grace period to get out of his favorite helmet.
The argument would be simple. First, the NFL never banned the Schutt AiR Advantage until Brown discovered several models that could be recertified for use by NOCSAE because they were under 10 years old. Once Brown identified and exploited the obvious loophole in last Monday's decision regarding his over-10-year-old helmet, the NFL quickly tried to fill it by testing the Schutt AiR advantage. in general.
Look like this: if the specific helmet that Brown had worn since entering the NFL in 2010 had been manufactured that year, he would still be able to wear it this year because he would be under 10 years old. The NFL has never reported, tested or banned the Schutt AiR Advantage until that Brown challenged the league's position on wearing a helmet older than 10 years. Then, once Brown realized that he could still carry a Schutt AiR advantage under the age of 10 (indeed, last Monday, the Raiders told Brown's camp that the league had said that it was "bad". he could), the NFL then found a way to disqualify the Schutt AiR Advantage in general and entirely.
Last year, the NFL banned some models of helmets previously worn by players such as quarterback Patriots Tom Brady and Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers. Even if these helmets had been deemed unsuitable for further use by NFL players, the NFL gave them a complete football season deal with this decision, explore different alternatives (as did Brady, regularly kissing a new headset before returning to the old headset several times) and eventually choose a new headset after the expiration of the time limit. thanks for a year. Brown, whose favorite helmet model was not banned by the league until the end of last week, will not get the same courtesy.
These are the nuances that are ignored by those who think Brown is just a baby in this situation. At the end of the day, Brown's grievance – and her seemingly enduring strategy for a late game – allowed the league to realize that she had never tested the Schutt AiR Advantage in sight its possible inscription on the list of banned helmet models. to do this test, then refusing to give Brown the same one-year transition period as others, after it was determined that their own favorite helmet models had been banned.
As fragile as Brown's first grievance, his second grievance – if he pursued it – would be much stronger.
[ad_2]
Source link