[ad_1]
AAt this point, it is unfair to call another radical change in Kamala Harris' policy a "flip-flop". This would imply that she has never held a difficult or original position in the first place.
Two years after co-sponsoring Bernie Sanders' Bill Medicare for All bill in the Senate and a month after the launch of an inconsistent health care proposal that would eliminate private insurers in a decade, Harris has set a new totally contradictory position in health care. Addressing Hamptons' billionaire donors this weekend, the hope for 2020 said that it was no longer "comfortable" with the Sanders plan that it was "uncomfortable". she had defended so fervently a few months before. Echoing comments earlier in the week stressing that "people want choice", Harris decided to re-engage with capitalism as a virtue and said that it would actually allow for private insurers to exist.
This kind of ambiguity would not win an election for the president of the high school class, let alone the White House. It may be for this reason that this tried paper tiger can not get into the double-digit national poll numbers. His average fourth-place Real Clear Politics is closer to Andrew Yang and Marianne Williamson than third-ranked Sanders.
The former top Californian policeman has not so clearly modeled his campaign on another young, seductive and black senator. But Barack Obama is not a formula, and Harris's attempt to move from socialist to moderate and each intermediate point obviously does not ignore the demographics as was the case for the former president.
On a granular level, Harris simply does not have the political means to convince the constituents in whom she believes, without even understanding, what she praises. In a race characterized by leader Joe Biden, who passionately defends the Obama administration's decidedly liberal policies against Sanders and Elizabeth Warren's resolutely centralized proposals, Harris is not fuzzy. She appears unintelligent.
She could easily remedy her lack of economic understanding by relying on her criminal record. But she has no legislative record to follow and it would be better if she does not talk about her criminal record at all.
Despite her jokes, she was stoned while listening to Tupac and Snoop Dog, implying that she was already acting district attorney in Alameda County. She jailed nearly 2,000 Californians for marijuana-related offenses as Attorney General.
Annulling a key campaign promise, Harris insisted that the San Francisco District Attorney, enforce state law on "three strikes" against non-violent offenders.
She criminalized school absenteeism, which resulted in several parents being incarcerated.
And despite his sudden insistence on the inhumanity of basic border controls, Harris has backed a law requiring schools to turn illegal immigrant children into ICEs. And his apparent contempt for the presumption of innocence during his scheduled interrogation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who is currently on the Supreme Court, was not the result of a mere political opportunity. In a case involving extensive exculpatory evidence, Harris refused to quash a rape conviction pronounced by a wholly white jury against a student from the Ghanaian university, resulting in his imprisonment and deportation. (The student's DNA was not found on the body of the accuser, who got a rape kit just hours after the incident. Nurse, however, found the sperm of her white boyfriend, who has never been considered a suspect.)
All politicians can not have an original story as illustrious as Obama. However, voters may well not accept a candidate whose political career was started by her boyfriend mayor, offering her an effortless patronage position in the government, which gave her a six-figure salary and a one-way salary. simple at the top of San Francisco politics.
Harris may appear to be a promising politician, but as her debate collapsed, she is nothing less than that under telegenic polish and half-cooked talking points. Prosecutors excel in deliberately challenging others, as evidenced by his illogical but vicious attack on Biden's enforced opposition in the first debate. But as dirty police do, she collapses from all angles. She can call herself liberal at will, but she has spent decades promoting policies that disproportionately target the poor in society. She can boast about the same tax and spending policies and punish the rich as the Socialists of 2020. She has been dining and dining with billionaires at Pacific Heights throughout her adult life while Sanders and Warren are coaching.
At present, three candidates dominate nearly two-thirds of all primary Democratic supporters. Despite repeated media claims that Harris is about to happen, she is still close to a poll of a Midwestern mayor. It's hard to see how this supposedly inevitable "moment" for Harris will happen.
[ad_2]
Source link