Close Pelosi ally announces support for Trump dismissal



[ad_1]

Donald Trump Melania TrumpPresident Donald Trump.TOLGA AKMEN / AFP / Getty Images

  • The movement to remove President Donald Trump from office has gained a vital ally this week when Representative Ben Ray Lujan announced his support for a dismissal investigation.
  • Lujan is a close ally of Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi and is the most prominent Democrat who has so far supported the impeachment process.
  • More than half of the Democrats in the House are now in favor of indicting or launching an indictment investigation against Trump. And since the suspension of Congress last month, more than two dozen Democrats have announced their support for this measure.
  • Visit BusinessInsider.com for more stories.

The urging to remove President Donald Trump from office has gained a vital ally this week when Representative Ben Ray Lujan announced his support for an indictment investigation.

Lujan is the fourth-highest Democrat in the House and a close ally of Speaker Nancy Pelosi. He is to this day the most prominent Democrat in indictment, and he has been instrumental in the election of many first-year Democrats, according to Politico. For this reason, his support for the measure could be a catalyst for younger and newer members of Congress.

More than half of the Democrats in the House are in favor of indicting or launching an impeachment proceeding against Trump. Lujan is the 127th Democrat in the House to support him, while 108 Democrats are against it, including Pelosi and several other lawmakers from the establishment.

Lujan, who is running for an open Senate seat in New Mexico next year, said his decision to support the impeachment process was influenced by the report of former special advocate, Robert Mueller, on the investigation conducted in Russia.

"The inaction of President Trump jeopardizes our elections, our national security and our democracy," said Lujan. "Not only did he ignore the warnings that our democracy is targeted, but he also actively encouraged Russian interference."

A senior Lujan advisor told the Washington Post that the legislature had supported an indictment investigation for a while, but did not want to stand before the moderate Democrats of the House that he had helped to elect. 39, last year. "The timing was right," said the assistant.

Read more: AG Barr said that there should be a "zero tolerance for police resistance" and then launched against "social justice reformers" in a lively speech to the largest US body charged of law enforcement.

The question of whether or not to remove the president after the publication of the Mueller report has dug a gap between Congressional Democrats. Pelosi rejects calls for removal, saying it would be a source of political division.

Instead, she said the six House-led inquiry committees should continue their extensive investigations into the administration, finance, trade relations, campaign, committee, and government. 39, inauguration, etc. of Trump.

However, the US House Speaker is waging a fierce battle against Democrats like New York representative Jerry Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, who told CNN this month that the panel was already leading a formal impeachment investigation.

"We are investigating all the evidence, gathering the evidence," Nadler said. "And we go [at the] conclusion of this – hopefully by the end of the year – vote to vote articles of impeachment in the House. Or we will not do it. It's a decision we will have to make. But that's exactly the process we're in right now. "

A prolonged battle

The House Intelligence Committee also plays an unprecedented key role in Nadler's impeachment investigation, Politico said, due to the nature of Mueller's findings in the investigation of Russia.

Read more: FBI agents are livid as Trump amplifies "theories" about Jeffrey Epstein's death "without real foundation"

By and large, Mueller's investigation involved two parts: a counterintelligence investigation examining Russia's interference in the 2016 election and a criminal investigation to determine whether Trump had obstructed justice after the FBI director, James Comey, publicly confirmed the existence of the investigation in March 2017.

While Nadler's panel is largely focused on the case of obstruction, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, has expressed interest in counter-intelligence findings. Mueller, including Trump's encouragement to Russia's interference in the 2016 race and his company's efforts to build a Trump tower in Moscow on time.

As head of the intelligence services group, Schiff has greater access to classified documents, much of which was contained in Mueller's counterintelligence investigation. And a source close to the California legislator told Politico that in a case as unique as Trump's, "it is important to consider all the evidence, including classified information. "

Last month, Nadler's committee asked a federal judge to disclose information relating to the grand jury of the Mueller inquiry, which was excluded from the version of his final report that the Justice Department has published in Congress and to the public.

In the record, counsel for the Chamber argued that the Judiciary and the Intelligence Committees wished to review the Grand Jury documents while Nadler's Committee determined "if there were grounds for recommending actions to be taken." impeachment against the president ".

Since the Judiciary Committee made this request, more than two dozen Democrats have come forward and publicly expressed their support for an indictment investigation.

But practically, the way forward is a little more troubled. Nadler's committee is waging a long battle against the White House to obtain documents and bring witnesses before the legislators on Trump's actions during the campaign and after taking office.

And we do not know how the committee will proceed once Congress is back from vacation: will it start drafting acts against Trump, or will it continue to take action? Administration with documents and testimonies?

The Democratic assistants told the post that they were not sure what to do with it.

[ad_2]

Source link