The future of Mickey Callaway depends on how Mets considers the work of the manager



[ad_1]

All right, let's go. The night the Mets were eliminated from the playoffs despite another masterpiece presented by Jacob deGrom, repeated winner of Cy Young, Mickey Callaway has been declared the best candidate to lead the team on the promised land in 2020.

But is it possible after 20 or 20 years to think that, despite the admirable resurrection of the club during the second half of the season and its entry into the race, a good deal of the motive for a turnaround spectacular was needed after a 40-51 drop in the first three games of the season -more months are at least partly due to a number of incomprehensible manager decisions?

In reality, the decisions themselves were not necessarily as inconsistent as the attempts to explain them. Callaway always seemed less sure of his answers than movements that had triggered post-match investigations. The reasons he gave for pitching movements were difficult to discern, and those relating to alignment decisions were sometimes overwhelming.

But maybe it's because so many of his decisions were eluding him and many of his decisions, before and in the game, had been commissioned by his front-office superiors, including the director. ubiquitous general, Brodie Van Wagenen. It must be considered that the Mets, 83-75 with four games to play, are guaranteed to finish with their third season victorious since 2008.

If the manager sends the message from management and Wilpon every day, will those in the executive suite be so quick to change messaging, regardless of the manager's weaknesses? After all, there was a significant hosting family this month. If that was the bar, the manager might have erased it.

Callaway was on the point after the Marlins '10-3 loss on Wednesday, which became immaterial with the Brewers' 9-2 win in Cincinnati that led the Mets to extinction. There was no broken thought or misapprehension when, asking if he thought he deserved another shot next year, he pronounced his statement.

"You know, obviously, I have the utmost confidence in myself," said Callaway, 159-160 years old as a great league coach for two years with the Mets, after being hired by the Former general manager Sandy Alderson to replace Terry Collins. "I'm never going to give up, never stop, and I think I'm the good guy to lead this team over there and I'm going to do it to the best of my abilities as long as I can. "

The Mets did not surrender to the items under Callaway's watch. For that, they deserve some recognition, but not as much as they claim to claim. Because trying from start to finish is a minimal requirement for professional athletes. It's not necessary to throw roses on the Mets because they started the season well by bowing 27-9 after losing the first game after the All-Star break and they were at home. a game and a half of a match. playoff position on August 22nd.

But then, fortified by a rotation of directional dreams including DeGrom, Noah Syndergaard, Steven Matz, Zack Wheeler and the acquisition of Marcus Stroman before the deadline, the Mets lost six straight to the Braves and Cubs. scrap. The fact is that the Mets played 13-15 in their previous 28 games before taking the Marlins' last two games. The race and the playoffs have eluded them.

If the pen was the place for tragi-comedy, with Van Wagenen's flagship win in the winter, Edwin Diaz, who slipped more often on banana peels than Charlie Chaplin, Callaway's handling of the pen was not a big deal. order to chaos. First, Diaz was going to be used to get three outs and no more. Then one day, maybe four. Of course, he was often unable to get the one that was needed.

But Callaway, a very successful pitching coach in Cleveland before getting this job, had a remarkably healthy rotation throughout the year, with deGrom, Syndergaard, Matz and Wheeler posting 122 starts. Any manager would have liked it.

He had Pete Alonso, now a shy league record for homers in a season by a rookie after beating No. 51 in the second run. He had reinforcements. He had a general manager who decided to go there by the deadline. The Mets were on the point. Then they were not.

There are probably more acute managers who might have won additional victories in this group, who might have avoided the calamity in the first half, who could have led the team to the playoffs . But does anyone plan to become a homeowner and that Van Wagenen hand over the keys to his car to a strong manager in the mold of a Joe Girardi, a Buck Showalter, or a man? Joe Maddon?

Callaway is declared the man of work in 2020. The question of whether this can be considered realistic depends on how the hierarchy defines this work.

[ad_2]

Source link