Carlson falsely claims his show is "not partisan" as the public feud with Fox News colleagues continues



[ad_1]

A quarrel between the press and opinion groups in Fox continued to unfold live on the infamous conservative news network.

The battle erupted on Tuesday after Andrew Napolitano, the network's legal analyst, told Shepard Smith, a presenter in the press, that President Donald Trump's own confessions about his interactions with Ukraine were "a crime."

That evening, Fox News opinion leader Tucker Carlson invited the conspiracy theorist Joseph DiGenova during his prime time program to refute the analysis of his own colleague.

"To attack our colleague who is here to offer legal assessments on our airwaves in our workhouse is disgusting," Smith replied the next day..

Carlson then invited DiGenova to return to his show as part of a so-called effort to "educate" Napolitano. The opinion host also took the opportunity to falsely claim that, unlike Fox News daytime animators, he was "not partisan".

"I have been a lawyer, independent investigator and legal counsel in the United States at Capitol Hill, in the House of Commons and in the Senate," said DiGenova. "Judge Napolitano has never been a barrister at the US Bar, he has never been a federal prosecutor, he has never headed a federal grand jury, I have done all the these things."

"I – he wants to have an opinion, that's fine – I'm not a paid contributor to Fox," he continued. "I'm a guest of the Fox Network, I come when they ask me."

Napolitano, who has described himself as a libertarian, has also said at Salon last year that he had managed to maintain a close friendship with Trump despite much criticism regarding what he considered to be illegal activities of the White House.

"I have not hesitated to write – if you look at my column two weeks ago – that much of the division of the country is due to the choice of his words – to him and to his behavior," said Napolitano at the time. "But my friendship persists – I mean, you have to ask him why he's always calling me.

Nevertheless, without calling Smith by name, Carlson sought to project his colleague's program as "not a news" but "an opinion".

"When you dress up a press blanket – when you dress up, you do more of the partisanship and pretend that your angry political opinions are new, you know, people are listening, "Carlson said on his show. DiGenova.

However, Carlson's assertion that Smith acted as an employee of the network opinion rather than an information division directly contradicts what his colleague from Fox News, who made a concerted effort to defend the separation of the two groups, said at Salon earlier this year.

"When it comes to news from FNC, it is sometimes difficult for some people who do not watch Fox to realize that there is an" opinion "side and a" news "side," News presenter Bret Baier told Salon in January. "So, when it takes me 592 days for President Trump to sit for an interview and a little longer for Chris Wallace, some people just paint with a paintbrush and get us all together." The president has often appeared on a number of shows. our opinion. . "

Salon also spoke to Carlson in January. During this interview, the Fox News specialist said that he thought "we are talking too much and thinking too much about Trump" – and he felt that the media should refrain from doing so. At the time, Carlson had also claimed that the so-called fixation on Trump was "a way to thwart real conversations, which make it difficult for people who get rich and those who are not."

"In this scenario, and in my show in general, I'm really trying to look like the only place we do not have to talk about Trump for an hour," Carlson said. "It's not because it's a political decision I've made." does not – but because I do not think it is so interesting. "

[ad_2]

Source link