[ad_1]
President Donald Trump visits the Oval Office of the White House in Washington on Thursday, September 26, 2019, on his return from the UN General Assembly in New York. (AP photo / Carolyn Kaster)
Calls to cancel subscriptions to The New York Times sparked serious concern Thursday night after the scandal caused by the newspaper's decision to identify whistleblower Trump as a CIA official.
In an article published earlier on Thursday, the Times revealed that the whistleblower at the center of a political clash in Washington is a CIA officer who had already been detailed at the White House.
The "exclusive details" were revealed in a report based on corroborated stories from three anonymous sources, not the whistleblower himself.
The whistleblower has filed a nine-page official complaint accusing the White House of covering a phone call in July between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in which Trump had asked the foreign leader to investigate the son of Former Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden.
The Times' identification claims to be the most known public information on the whistleblower. The paper's decision was largely rejected online, becoming the number one favorite topic with the #CancelNYT hashtag.
TRUMP CLAIMS A MAJOR MEDIA AS 'SCUM & # 39; AND & ANIMALS & # 39; AT A PRIVATE EVENT, CRITICAL ADVERTISER: ANNOUNCEMENT
"Did you really denounce the whistleblower? If something happens to him, it's up to you, #CancelNYT, " tweeted a person.
"The heroes of our country are worth more than just clicks and views. Doxxing the whistleblower endangers the life of the individual, which is particularly heinous if one considers that the whistleblower has gone through the appropriate government channels. The NYT protects Trump sources better than that. #Cancel, " wrote Dr. Eugene Gu.
In addition to canceling subscriptions, others have even called for the dismissal of Dean Baquet, Times editor.
"Dean Baquet should definitely lose his job because of that." "The security of the launcher is already compromised, but @untime must condemn this decision to protect future sources and launchers." can not be left as an acceptable precedent. #Announcement, "The Twitter user @KristinMinkDC wrote.
Baquet reacted to criticism in an article published Thursday night, saying the Times had decided to publish "limited information" on the whistleblower to give it credibility against Trump's claims that the unidentified person would be a "political hack job".
"The president and some of his supporters attacked the credibility of the whistleblower, who presented information that triggered a historic indictment," said Baquet. "We wanted to provide readers with information to make their own opinion about their credibility or not."
REPUBLICANS WANT SOURCES OF OPENING SIGNALING, INCONSTANCES IN THE MOVEMENT OF COMPLAINTS
Online reviews seemed foolish on the part of those who defended the newspaper, such as the author of Times Wajahat Ali, who called on the public to "reconsider" its decision to cancel subscriptions.
"He employs fantastic journalists and breaks important stories. It's also under the direct assault of Trump and his supporters, "he tweeted. "I write for them but I also publicly disagree with some decisions, like today 's. Yet the good far outweighs the bad. "
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Many netizens said they have had enough with the old gray lady, who has been criticized for a series of editorial blunders, including a report on allegations of sexual assault against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The alleged object of the bomb failed to mention that the alleged victim had refused to be questioned and did not remember the alleged sexual assault.
[ad_2]
Source link