Citibank sues over $ 176 million payment made in error



[ad_1]

A 'Citi' sign is displayed near Citibank headquarters in Manhattan.Image copyright
Getty Images

US banking giant Citigroup has asked a federal court to force hedge fund Brigade Capital to return $ 176 million (£ 134 million).

The money is part of the $ 900 million the bank accidentally passed on to creditors of struggling cosmetics company Revlon.

The bank said it intended to send Brigade just $ 1.5 million to cover interest on a loan held by the hedge fund.

Citigroup attributes the accidental overpayment to an “operational error”.

In a filing in New York’s Southern District court, Citigroup said it intended to make interest payments on behalf of Revlon, but transferred amounts more than 100 times the size planned.

“When Citibank discovered the error, it promptly asked the recipients to return its money,” the third largest US bank on the record said.

Citigroup was preparing to step down as an administrative agent for the Revlon loan when it accidentally transferred around $ 900 million to lenders last week amid a bitter fight between the cosmetics company and creditors.

Some of those who received the overpayments returned the money to Citigroup, while others, including Brigade, did not immediately return it.

Brigade was supposed to receive interest on a loan of $ 174.7 million, according to the complaint.

Can you keep the money paid in error? Usually no and if you spend the money it can in some circumstances become a criminal matter. That said, there are other issues in this case. Brigade had loaned Revlon money, and the erroneous payment covered the unpaid amount – although that did not mean Brigade was necessarily entitled to receive it now. It was simply an interest payment of a much smaller amount than Citibank intended to pay on behalf of Revlon.

There is another layer to this story. Another bank acting on behalf of Brigade and other creditors was already suing Revlon. The lawsuit accused Revlon of stealing – that’s the word used in court documents – collateral used for loans. This means assets, in this case Revlon brands, that could be used to cover any shortfall in loan repayments.

Citibank is named with Revlon as one of the defendants in the lawsuit. The bank is accused of gross negligence and willful misconduct. This lawsuit asked a New York court to declare the loan “due and payable”. Creditors, including Brigade, say they are legally entitled to the money now, and to their surprise, they received it, although if it gets to court it will be up to the judge to decide whether they can keep it.

Instead, he got $ 176.2 million and refused to reimburse the funds “despite clear evidence that the payments were made in error,” Citigroup said, noting that the money belonged to the bank and no to Revlon.

Revlon has been hit hard by the coronavirus pandemic and Brigade is one of the creditors who sued the company over its debt restructuring plans.

Citigroup declined to comment further on the matter. Brigade did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the BBC.

[ad_2]

Source link