[ad_1]
Too much time is going on to wait until Sunday, so here’s a special Tuesday bonus edition of Roob’s 10 Random Eagles Sightings!
Including a conspiracy theory on Jason Peters, thoughts on the future of Doug Pederson, and a crazy statistic of Rich Kotite vs Pederson.
1. The only thing more disturbing that Pederson insists on playing Alshon Jeffery ahead of the Eagles’ promising young receivers is that part of his explanation: “He’s part of what we’ve done and the success we’ve had here.”
Seriously? Who cares what he was a part of three years ago? Because he had an incredible TD take in the Super Bowl, do you still run him at the expense of John Hightower or Quez Watkins when he’s no longer able to contribute? Why not bring back LeGarrette Blount, Wendell Smallwood, and Corey Graham while you’re at it.
2. Something monumental happened on Sunday. With the loss of the Eagles, Pederson’s WL career record fell to 41-32-1 and his winning percentage dropped from .569 to .561. Why is this important? Because Kotite in his four years went 36-28, which is a .563 winning percentage. So here is. Kotite now has a higher winning percentage as the Eagles head coach than Pederson.
3. I’m not going to say the Eagles’ offensive line has been good. This is not the case. But I would say at least 30% of the sacks were on Carson Wentz standing there not feeling the pressure, lacking pocket presence, holding the ball too long, not seeing the pitch and ultimately getting crushed.
4. If this season continues to derail – let’s say something like 5-10-1 – it will be fascinating to see the changes Jeff Lurie makes as Lurie isn’t the type to watch his team plunge into the depths of the NFL and s’ sit lazily and do nothing. He never did. The Eagles have won five games or less just three times in 26 years as an owner – 1998, 1999 and 2012. He fired Ray Rhodes after a 3-13 season in 1998 and replaced him with Andy Reid, whom he returned after a 4-12 season in 2012.
How long does a Super Bowl in 2017 to buy Pederson now? Maybe another year. But Super Bowl LII was three years ago, and the franchise tends to go down every year, and so Lurie studies this season and doesn’t see a reason to hope in 2021 and doesn’t see improvement from the quarterback. , I really believe there is a good chance that he will make a change of coach in January.
5. What’s going on with Howie Roseman? I think it is much less likely, but not outside the realm of possibility, that he will see his responsibilities transferred. But what’s interesting is that assuming the Eagles don’t win this NFC East watered-down – and they won’t – they’ll have a pretty high draft pick. Top 10 and possibly top five or six. It’s a huge choice for this team. Modification of the deductible. This does not happen often.
The Eagles have had only two top picks in the past 20 years – Lane Johnson in 2013 and Wentz in 2016. Does Lurie want the guy who drafted JJ Arcega-Whiteside, Sidney Jones, Andre Dillard and Jalen Hurts to do such a monumental choice? Maybe not?
6. Frank Reich is a brilliant attacking spirit, without a doubt, and a hell of a head coach. That said, the idea that his departure is directly related to Wentz’s decline doesn’t add up. Wentz, while healthy in 2018 and 2019, threw 48 touchdowns and 14 INTs, completed 66% of his passes and secured a 96.7 passer rating – the ninth-highest in the league over the course of this two-year period. It was without Reich. With Pederson. Do the Eagles miss Reich? Sure. Is that why Wentz is struggling so badly? No.
seven. I love the tenacity and aggressiveness of Avonte Maddox, and I think he is decent in the slot machine. The reality is he’s not a starting outside turn, and I would put CB2 at or near the top of the Eagles’ wishlist for the offseason.
8. If Alex Singleton loses a snapshot when Nate Gerry returns, there must be a congressional investigation.
9. Sunday’s loss ensured the Eagles will go a third straight year without 10 wins, something they haven’t done since 1997-99 and haven’t done under the same head coach since 1983-85. under Marion Campbell.
ten. OK, who’s up for a good conspiracy theory? Tried to find some sort of rational reason why the Eagles refuse to replace a failed Peters with a promising 23-year-old Jordan Mailata as anyone who has looked at them can clearly see that Peters is pretty much out of gas and Mailata is an impressive young tackle with a lot of advantages who needs all the reps he can get.
Here’s my theory: The Eagles want Dillard to be their left tackle going forward because he was a first-round pick and they’re financially committed to him. And they fear that if Mailata plays really well in the last six games, it will be difficult for them to justify Dillard leaving next year against Mailata.
Hey, I told you it was a conspiracy theory. I don’t know how you explain such a misguided decision.
Subscribe to the Eagle Eye podcast:
Apple Podcasts | Google Play | Spotify | Stitcher | Art19 | Watch on youtube
[ad_2]
Source link