[ad_1]
The daily beast
We can do in the Senate what the British did in the House of Lords
Photo illustration by The Daily Beast / Getty After two centuries as an anti-democratic force, the Senate must adapt or it might one day wake up and find that its powers have been reduced to ceremonial engagements. Do not laugh! It wasn’t that long ago that our neighbors across the pond did just that in the House of Lords. The English Parliament has existed since 1295, and since its inception the House of Lords has generally been the dominant chamber of the bicameral legislature of England. She represented the clergy, the nobility and the landowners and had more of a say in the formation of the British government than the House of Commons which represented the people. However, that all changed in the early 1900s as England faced social changes that were not all that different from the current political turmoil in the United States. the common man gained political prominence, and they demanded that the government exist to serve the people and not the British elites. They wanted the government to play a bigger and more active role in the well-being of its citizens instead of the government’s petty, unregulated, laissez-faire elite program.In 1909, the Liberal Party that controlled the House of Commons passed the People’s Budget which proposed unprecedented taxes on the land and income of the wealthy Britons to fund social welfare programs to alleviate poverty, provide medical care and improve public education. Unsurprisingly, the disconnected House of Lords rejected the budget, and in response the Liberal Party proposed a bill to reduce the power of the House of Lords, and soon the people’s budget and the future of the House of Lords have become the main issues. A young Winston Churchill was a major supporter of the People’s Budget and he enjoyed the battle against the House of Lords.In April 1910, a year after its introduction, the House of Lords approved the People’s Budget, but the damage to their political position had already been done. In 1910, the Liberal Party retained control of the House of Commons and began to systematically reduce the power of the House of Lords. At first they flooded the House of Lords with members of the Liberal Party, but that was only the beginning.With King George V’s approval, the Parliament Act of 1911 was enacted and revoked the power of House veto on legislation of the House of Commons. The act gave the House of Commons a method to bypass the House of Lords and send legislation directly to the King or Queen for approval. In 1949, a second Act of Parliament was passed which further diminished the power of the House of Lords. For over a century the House of Lords has been a ceremonial entity devoid of political power, but for the last 600 years she had been the dominant voice. in the English government. Despite its powerlessness, the House of Lords is still referred to as the upper house of parliament. Today, the removal of his powers is seen as a watershed moment in making England a more democratic society, and in 2021, America’s House Democrats have an ambitious and popular legislative agenda not too different from that of the United States. England of a century ago. There are bills to protect voting rights, provide a pathway to citizenship for undocumented Americans, raise minimum wages, raise Washington statehood, and provide relief to struggling Americans. COVID-19; and it is expected that as a result of filibustering and the 60-vote requirement, many of these bills will die in the Senate despite the Democrats’ majority. Republican Party is so far-fetched and vulgar that it can make people believe that the destructive and undemocratic behavior of the GOP is a historical anomaly. Yet, tragically, this political incivility has long been the norm for the Senate. Since the 1830s, Conservative senators have used filibuster to block the Senate and prevent the passage of laws. At that time, South Carolina Senator John C. Calhoun used filibuster to defend the institution of slavery against the growing abolitionist movement reshaping the North. Calhoun was a shameless racist who saw slavery as a “positive good” and whose constituency was made up of white Americans who owned land and people and not enslaved black Americans who made up more than half of the population. the state. Jim Crow Slavery Sanctuary. Will the South Carolina GOP let him? And for at least that long, the Senate has served as an obstacle to progress and democracy, and it still uses filibuster to kill legislation that promotes racial equality. Filtration was frequently used during Jim Crow as Americans attempted to end our apartheid state and, unsurprisingly, Republicans adopted filibuster to undermine the legislative agenda of America’s first black president. If the Democrats tried to abolish the filibuster. In fact, it was the same week that the House passed the American Dream and Promise Act and the Farm Workforce Modernization Act, which provides a pathway to citizenship for some undocumented Americans, but due to the filibuster and Conservative filibustering, it is unlikely that either bill will come out of the Senate and become law. Popular laws that promote racial equality and the right to vote will die again in the Senate, but while Senate obstruction of democracy has been the American norm for two centuries, that doesn’t mean it has to last forever. too often exists to defend minority positions on the right to vote, immigration, gender equality and income inequality. The Senate couldn’t even bring itself to condemn President Donald Trump in his second impeachment trial after orchestrating an attack on Capitol Hill, despite the overwhelming support of the American people. , the only way to advance our democracy might be to transform it into the United States House of Lords by reducing its political power and relegating it to ceremonial functions. It’s happened before and it could happen again. Read more on The Daily Beast. Get our best stories delivered to your inbox every day. Register now! Daily Beast Membership: Beast Inside delves deeper into the stories that matter to you. Learn more.
[ad_2]
Source link