[ad_1]
Piers Morgan takes another hit at Meghan Markle by questioning a claim she made about her alleged secret marriage to Prince Harry.
Morgan faced an overwhelming backlash earlier this month after saying he just didn’t believe some of the Duchess of Sussex’s claims in a revealing interview with Oprah Winfrey, in which the couple made shocking statements about the royal family and their working time. as senior members. The broadcaster ended up storming the set for “Good Morning Britain” before quitting his job the day after the interview aired in the UK.
On Monday, the TV host questioned Markle’s credibility by sharing a Daily Mail article on Twitter. The article reports that the couple’s claims that they were married in a private ceremony, days before their lavish royal wedding, were refuted by the publication of their marriage certificate by the registry office.
PRINCE HARRY AND MEGHAN MARKLE AT RISK OF LOSS OF ROYAL TITLES DURING OPRAH INTERVIEW: SOURCES
“Do we still have to believe her?” Morgan wrote in a tweet accompanying the article.
During their long two-hour shoot with Winfrey, the couple claimed they were already married before their ceremony on May 19, 2018. Harry confirmed in the interview that the ceremony only included himself, his wife. future wife and Archbishop of Canterbury, who also performed their May 19 ceremony.
Although the couple may have had a personal and private ceremony, it was not an official wedding as they would not have met certain criteria set by the church.
Piers Morgan took another hit at Meghan Markle on Twitter during her interview with Oprah Winfrey.
(MWE / GC images)
Representatives for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex made no comment when contacted by Fox News.
MEGHAN MARKLE RECALLS SHE “ DIDN’T WANT TO BE ALIVE ”
The Official Rules for Clergymen provided by the Church of England set out the very specific circumstances for which the Church defines a legal marriage. The book states that “an already legally married couple cannot choose to remarry unless there is doubt as to the validity of the previous marriage.”
Moreover, Harry’s claim that the private ceremony took place right between him, his wife and the Archbishop poses another problem. According to the regulations, two or more witnesses must be present at the wedding for it to be considered legally binding. It is not known if the Archbishop counts as one of the witnesses.
CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO OUR ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER
The rules also state that a private and exclusive ceremony in the garden is a problem, as the public must have unrestricted access to the building during any wedding ceremony to allow valid objections to the marriage.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The Archbishop of Canterbury’s office made no comment when previously contacted by Fox News.
[ad_2]
Source link