[ad_1]
Hello Mike, looks like C. Patterson would like to be a Packer? I would certainly do my best to achieve this if I were the general manager of the pack. I think it would really improve the much-needed comeback game. What do you think of a legitimate move to get C. Patterson?
Social media makes things interesting, doesn’t it? I have no idea what the Packers are interested in. I think it would mainly depend on the price.
Although the subject of sports films has been tabled, I must say that the omission of “The Big Lebowski” is disheartening. That said, I’m right now somewhere near Indianapolis enjoying my very first Steak ‘n’ Shake burger, so thanks for that. The II remains.
First day back and you bring up Steak ‘n’ Shake? Now I need another vacation.
Given that the draft is being considered at Lambeau Field, where would the Packers staff have their war room so that outside activities are not a major distraction for them?
They would be totally isolated from it all and would not have to move. The draft room is inside the third floor with no windows, and if they didn’t soundproof it, I’m sure they could.
Greg from Glendale Heights, IL
The return of the king … welcome Spoff! No heartbreaking news while you’re gone, but plenty of good news that brings leaders back on both sides of the ball. This calm (predictable) free agent season makes me wonder, who do you consider to be the most successful free agent acquisition in Packers history, at least as per the perception of the time?
Well the list always starts with Reggie White and Charles Woodson, but beyond them the ones I remember getting the most buzz were Sean Jones, Santana Dotson, Joe Johnson and Julius Peppers.
People think the Packers didn’t rework Aaron’s contract so they could move to Jordan. I think they don’t want to move more of his contract down the road where he’s already a huge chunk of the salary cap. Remember, the further down the road they go, the less work they have to do with them. We have a few years before we get back to a decent cap.
I specifically remember Gutekunst saying in his media / Zoom session in early March that his free agency approach would be to create a cap room as he goes. This means that if the right free agent opportunity presents itself and the Packers want to jump, they will make room, but not necessarily in advance. There is still plenty of time for contractual machinations if necessary.
George from North Mankato, MN
Welcome back Mike, hope you enjoyed your stay. Are you just wondering if you know how the Packers rate for “dead cap” hits an average year? Do you think adding voidable years to many of the team’s restructured deals will present challenges in the near future? Can you share any other Russ Ball secrets to stay the course?
I don’t know where the Packers rank each year in terms of dead money, but they’ve kept their numbers low in this department by design. The only major success I can remember over the past decade is when they took out Nick Perry for two years on a five-year contract. Given the circumstances, I don’t think the Packers are imposing an outrageous amount of caps. Yes, there will be challenges this year and next, but they (along with several other teams) are just looking to bridge the gap until new TV money brings the cap back to where it was and to the bottom. -of the.
Steven from Silver Spring, MD
With the signing of Kevin King, we are returning all the starting lineup from the previous year. Today, tuberculosis does the same. Does that sound like it’s related to the COVID era or just random circumstances?
Contenders aren’t interested in major overhauls if they don’t feel their team has grown too old. Unusual cap considerations certainly play into the offseason approach at the moment, but investing in your own players (the known) instead of other players (the unknown) is almost always preferred by teams who legitimately feel in the game. hunting rather than trying to get in.
Jason from Vernon Hills, IL
Do you think the Packers will try to keep Aaron Rodgers as long as he wants to play? Or do you think they will leave him after this season?
Rodgers hit the nail on the head last spring when he said what he controls the most about his future at Green Bay is how he plays. I don’t think that has changed. If he plays at MVP level for years to come and stays healthy, Jordan Love might never take a meaningful photo for the Packers. I’m not saying it’s going to happen, but I’m not ruling it out, and if it does, it shouldn’t be seen as the bad outcome or an indictment of investing in Love. But it’s also a two-way street involving Rodgers’ personal desires, contract demands, etc., which could change over time. So I’m not too addicted to it anyway. Sitting here right now, I believe if Rodgers keeps playing like this and wants to keep playing Green Bay, unequivocally, he’s not going to give the Packers any reason to pass the torch.
[ad_2]
Source link