Kamala Harris dismisses concerns over the Green New Deal price tag: "It's not a cost"



[ad_1]

Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has clearly refused in an interview broadcast Sunday to put a price tag on the Green New Deal and the "Medicare-for-all", which she has endorsed unreservedly. , even as Republicans cite non-partisan estimates of billions of dollars for every dollar unprecedented. proposal.

Harris, D-Calif., Joins Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., And Cory Booker, D-N.J. co-sponsor the Green New Deal resolution earlier this month. The failed deployment of the resolution included the publication of an official document by the office of New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who promised economic security even for people "reluctant to work", as well as the 39, elimination of "farting cows" and air travel.

"There is no question that we have to be pragmatic, but being pragmatic also means recognizing that climate change is an existential threat to us as human beings," Harris said. "Being practical, it's recognizing that greenhouse gas emissions are a threat to our air and to our planet.And as humans, we are quite able to modify our behaviors so as to reduce the effects, it is practical, can afford it. "

CNN's John King has asked Harris to respond to conservative arguments that progressive proposals could do more harm than good by paralyzing the US economy even as major polluters like China continue unabated.

FEINSTEIN INFORMS CHILDREN CRITICING ON THIS TO SUPPORT GREEN NEW DEAL, INDICATING THAT ONE OF THEM CAN NOT VOTE LEGALLY

According to the Mercatus Center of George Washington University, for example, the Ocasio-Cortez plan for universal health insurance would cost more than $ 30 trillion even after taking into account major tax increases that would only offset expenses of about $ 2 trillion. Charles Blahous, chief strategist of the Mercatus Center and author of the study, later claimed that Ocasio-Cortez had largely mischaracterized his study in a bid to argue that "Medicare for all "would save money.

"One of the things that I admire and respect is the measure that is captured in three letters: the return on investment," replied Harris. "What is the return on investment?" People in the private sector understand this very well, it's not a cost, it's an investment, and then the question should be: is it worth it in terms of investment potential "to return more than we put?"

The Green New Deal campaign provoked resistance not only from Republicans but also from some key Democrats. Senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii was questioned about the plan to replace planes with a high-speed train and did not seem impressed.

"It would be hard enough for Hawaii," she laughed.

Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi also appeared to reject the plan.

"This will be one of the many, if not many, suggestions we will receive," Pelosi told Politico. "The green dream, or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but they are for, is not it?"

"It's not a cost, it's an investment."

– 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris

Other Democratic presidential candidates, including Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar, warned that the Green New Deal resolution was simply "ambitious" and should probably be scaled down.

"The Green New Deal – I see it as an aspiration – I see it as a revival," Klobuchar said in "Special Report with Bret Baier" earlier this month. "Then I would vote yes [on the Green New Deal resolution]but I would also like – if it boiled down to a real law, as opposed to: "Oh, here are some goals we have" – ​​um, it would be different for me. "

THE COUNCILOR OF THE AOC AGREES THAT IT WAS FALSE AND HAD SAID THAT THE ARTICLE "GREEN NEW DATA" WOULD HAVE PROMISED MONEY FOR THOSE WHO WOULD NOT WISH TO WORK

But Harris said she was eager to resolve the conflict with her rivals in public, during one of the 12 planned Democratic primary debates.

"I look forward to participating in this debate at the debate stage," Harris said. "I can not wait to be there."

Meanwhile, the White House envisions socialism becoming the defining theme of the 2020 debate, amid the Democratic 's changing vows for a higher minimum wage and a new range of costly and universal benefits.

Speaking Monday in an important foreign policy speech delivered in Miami by members of the Venezuelan community, President Trump said Monday that "a new day is coming in Latin America" ​​and has published a critical assessment that "socialism is dying" in the world. This is the second time that Trump has publicly and forcefully condemned what he called "the horrors of socialism and communism" and the "massive confiscation of wealth" in recent weeks, following his similar vow of State of the Union speech about being a socialist country ".

But before Trump faced the final candidate, Democratic Party leaders acknowledged that some internal divisions needed to be resolved. Harris joined Warren this week stating that she supported taxpayer-funded repairs for black Americans victims of slavery, a position that Democratic National Committee chairman Tom Perez has declared to "Fox." News Sunday "has not been officially endorsed by the party and should be dispelled during debates too.

In the meantime, Harris pointed out that his main concern was that of ordinary Americans.

"I hear people in the state of Iowa, in New Hampshire, South Carolina – name them where you want." In Wisconsin, Michigan, I went into these places too, "said Harris, contrasting with Hillary Clinton, who did not visit Wisconsin following the 2016 Democratic National Convention and eventually lost the state to President Trump's benefit , today became president. "What they want to know is that people who want to be the leaders of this country see them and think about the problems that keep them from sleeping at night."

But union leaders – who usually represent constituents of the Democratic base – have postponed the Green New Deal in recent weeks.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Says in front of Reuters, a spokesman for the coal industry union, United Mine Workers (UMWA), has expressed concern over the call launched by the Green New Deal resolution in favor of a "just and equitable transition for all communities and all workers" in order to "achieve emissions-free greenhouse gas emissions" in just ten years time.

"We had already heard words like" just transition, "but what does that really mean?" Said spokesman Phil Smith during an interview. "Our members are afraid to put food on the table."

Even outside the Green New Deal, conservative commentators have argued that most of the proposed solutions to global warming would do more harm than good, and have also accused climate activists of crying wolf. In 2006, a NASA scientist and a leading researcher on global warming said the world had only 10 years to avert a climate catastrophe – a deadline that has passed.

[ad_2]

Source link