Tesla Vehicle Reviews Are Useless … Here’s Why

by



[ad_1]

This is a preview of our weekly newsletter. Each week I go beyond the news and hand create a special edition that includes my thoughts on the biggest stories, why it matters, and how it might impact the future.

Tesla vehicle reviews are probably one of the most unnecessary things to read, in my opinion, especially if they are from a large group or entity with interests that anyone can trace through the money. Earlier this week, Edmunds posted a scathing review of the Model S Plaid, calling it a “waste of money” and claiming it was nothing more than a marketing tool to make an aging vehicle relevant again. . Despite those words, which caught the attention of many readers in the first 48 hours, the Edmunds driver couldn’t wipe the big, bright smile from his face as he felt the vehicle’s instant torque take off as a roller coaster.

For something that is such a mess, it certainly gave the staff at Edmunds a lot of fun. Of course, vehicle performance is not necessarily a benchmark for whether an automobile is “good” or not. If a car is fast, people will love it because fast cars are just plain fun whether you are a driver or a passenger. However, reviews of electric cars, Tesla in particular, are not well received, and that is not necessarily nobody’s fault per se. Instead, I see it as an opportunity for people to express their opinions without talking about generalities or thinking their point of view is a fact. Of course, you could say the same about this newsletter.

For me, the understanding of electric cars, Tesla in particular, should be examined by someone who is seasoned and fully understands what goes on under the hood (I use that term loosely now) because without the basic understanding of this that you’re driving, you’re really not qualified to talk about it. Moreover, whether something is a “waste of money” really depends on the consumer. If you buy a Model S Plaid for performance stats, you’re getting the world’s fastest car for millions of dollars less than its competition. Of course, if you buy it for range and a daily driver, that could be seen as a ‘waste’ as the Long Range variant is probably a better option. However, some people find that they won’t have their money forever, and the extra cost of $ 40,000 is just arbitrary from their perspective.

For me, there are just too many factors that reviews are unnecessary when it comes to some cars, especially the faster ones. I will discuss a few of them here, and look forward to hearing your point of view with others.

Credit: Tesla

Internal interests

Tesla fans don’t hesitate to report when a product receives negative review or any sort of pushback. Many of them claim internal interests without really doing their own due diligence, claiming that some entities have their pockets filled with money from oil or whatever the mind can grab. Sometimes, however, they are not far off. CarMax bought Edmunds in April, which means the company is no longer independent and is owned by a large company with ties to Chrysler, Mitsubishi, Toyota and Nissan.

It is always important to see what are the interests of certain entities when talking about a car or any product for that matter. Quite simply, people with the ability to put their name on an article or video and distribute it for millions of people to digest have a responsibility to be biased. It doesn’t always work that way.

Opinions on features

This is one of my most important points. Edmunds was quick to dismiss the usefulness of the yoke, saying “the yoke was a joke”. Yeah, they really wrote that on Twitter.

The point is, I’ve been watching the Yoke ever since it was going to be included in Model S, and while I’ve spoken to many government agencies and Tesla employees about the Yoke, the wheel is really a personal preference. The car is obviously designed for performance, and performance vehicles, especially cars with open wheels, like the F1 series vehicles, use a Yoke for full control at high speed. It’s likely that Tesla didn’t go for the Yoke for this reason, but he may have included it as a clue to a steering wheel-less cockpit in the future. That’s my idea in any case, especially since the company is flying towards autonomy.

I have NEVER met a single person who didn’t like to drive the Yoke for what it’s worth.

Of course, a review includes some personal preferences, and that’s okay. However, downsizing a vehicle in this way, which is arguably the most advanced car on the market in terms of software, performance and technology, smacks of too many opinions, for me. Stick to the facts, is it a good car? Is it functional? Is it doing what the automaker said it would do?

Cars are made to be tested individually

The most logical way to find out if a car is right for you is to drive it yourself. You should never stray completely from someone else’s opinion. It makes no sense to do this. If cars were to be purchased based on someone else’s experience, no one would drive PT Cruisers (they’re horribly ugly), and everyone would drive what someone else would like them to be. they drive. Let’s not forget: Cars, while they are an important part of life because they get us to work, to events, and wherever we need to go, are meant to be nice and fun. Not a single person on this Earth wants to drive a car they hate if they don’t have to. Hell, when my dad bought me a 2003 Taurus in college because my Jetta died, I hated it. It was like driving a boat. I was embarrassed by the putrid blue color. I hated the seats, the stereo, and in the winter I had to keep a hand on the driver’s door because the latch didn’t work, and the part was out of stock. There’s nothing quite like driving down the freeway to get to class on time and keeping the door closed for life, hoping you don’t get out. I had no other choice, I was a broke college kid, and it’s a car that drove me from point A to point B. But I’ll never drive a car I hate again.

The thing is, someone I went to high school with liked their 2003 Taurus. They talked about its powerful V6 engine and fine leather interior. It was a car they liked. I’m sure it was a nice car, I didn’t like it.

This gets to my point: just because someone else hates it and thinks it’s a bunch of garbage doesn’t mean it actually is. It’s just an opinion. Do you want to know if a car is good or not? Drive it yourself and tell your friends what you think about it. Your opinion of the car will not change theirs.

I’ll say this: it’s important to have these pieces of literature to show us the negative parts of a car. As if the software isn’t great, or the touchscreen isn’t very responsive, or the center console isn’t moving properly. These are understandable reviews, but none of them are opinionated. If the software isn’t great, people will see it. This could prevent them from buying a car prematurely.

That being said, there is plenty of evidence to suggest that the Plaid Model S is a great vehicle, and other evidence suggests that Tesla has things to work on. Whichever side of the ball you are on, believe your opinion, but be open to other people’s points as well. Also, make the final decision about a car in your spare time, don’t get confused by someone else’s words. This is how you end up with something that you really don’t like to drive.

Many thanks to our longtime supporters and new subscribers! Thank you.

I use this newsletter to share my thoughts on what’s going on in the Tesla world. If you want to talk to me directly, you can email me or reach me on Twitter. I don’t bite, be sure to reach out!

Tesla Vehicle Reviews Are Useless… Here’s Why








[ad_2]

Source link