[ad_1]
Britney Spears’ lawyer has taken Jamie Spears to task over new allegations of intrusive and possibly illegal surveillance.
Lawyer Mathew Rosengart dropped the hammer in an LA County Superior Court case on Monday after the recent release of the FX / Hulu documentary “Controlling Britney Spears” and a New York Times report published in conjunction with the film.
“Sir. Spears was of course never fit to serve, for all of the many compelling reasons already on file, ranging from his lack of financial sense to his bankruptcy, to his reported alcoholism, to the trauma he caused. to his daughter since he was a child, to the domestic violence restriction order recently issued against him, ”Rosengart wrote in a third supplement to a petition calling for the impeachment of Jamie Spears as her daughter’s estate registrar .
“But now the chickens have really come home to roost,” he continued. The New York Times “reported that Mr. Spears had engaged in gruesome and unreasonable invasions of the privacy of his adult daughter. Specifically, The Times reported that he and others “ran an intense surveillance apparatus that monitored [Ms. Spears’] communications’ and also obviously captured attorney-client communications with his former attorney… a sacrosanct part of the legal system.
Jamie Spears’ attorney Vivian Thoreen did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Los Angeles Times.
“Controlling Britney Spears” obtained its information from Alex Vlasov, a former employee of Black Box Security; Felicia Culotta, the singer’s friend and assistant; and Tish Yates, who was the wardrobe manager for several Spears tours during the tutorship and said she has a close relationship with her.
Among the allegations:
- Britney Spears’ security team functioned more like prison guards
- Members of the security team were reportedly given prepackaged envelopes of medication which they then forced into Spears.
- All of Britney’s movements were documented in group texts which included Edan Yemini, the head of Black Box Security; Robin Greenhill of Tri Star Sports and Entertainment Group, who handled the singer’s business affairs; and Jamie Spears.
- All of Spears’ phone activity was reportedly monitored using a mirrored iPad.
- An audio recording device was placed in Spears’ bedroom and captured hundreds of hours of private interactions.
- Spears’ spending was so tightly regulated that she had to squeeze in some sushi and a pair of Skechers.
- Jamie Spears allegedly tried to create a wedge between Spears and Culotta.
- Black Box has reportedly investigated the #FreeBritney movement.
Vlasov, 30, was an executive assistant and operations and cybersecurity manager for Black Box, which was hired by Jamie Spears to look after his daughter. During his nine years with the company, Vlasov told The New York Times, he was “the one person at Black Box who really knew everything,” due to his position close to the founder of the company.
His recollection of the events was supported by others involved in the guardianship who wanted to remain anonymous, according to the New York Times. Vlasov provided emails, texts and audio recordings to substantiate his claims.
Jamie Spears said in an Aug.12 filing that he planned to step down as his daughter’s financial conservator, although he claimed there was no legal reason for her removal, but did proposed no timeline. He said he had to hang around to deal with several accounting issues and accused Rosengart of acting on Britney’s behalf “hastily, without proper investigation, and on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations and inappropriate opinions.”
He also wondered if changing restaurateurs at this point would be in the singer’s interest. Then, on September 7, reversing the course, he filed a petition to end the 13-year-old guardianship.
“As Mr. Spears has said time and time again, all he wants is what’s best for his daughter,” the document said. “If Ms. Spears wants to end the guardianship and thinks she can manage her own life, Mr. Spears thinks she should be given that chance.”
Jamie Spears served as Britney Spears and her Estate Curator until he was replaced as Personal Curator in 2019.
Rosengart hit back at Jamie Spears in Monday’s case, which was obtained by the Los Angeles Times.
“Sir. Spears has crossed unfathomable lines. While not evidence, the allegations warrant serious investigation,” he wrote, noting that California is a two-party consent state as far as Concerning the recording of private communications. He scoffed at Jamie Spears’ assertion that there was no legal reason to dismiss him as a Curator as “legally and factually absurd.”
“Sir. Spears’ latest delay efforts are to be rejected; he is to be suspended Sept. 29; followed by an early termination of trusteeship,” the record reads.
The court will hold its next guardianship hearing on Wednesday in downtown Los Angeles.
Times editor Meredith Blake contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
Source link