Jon Stewart’s new show roasted by Rolling Stone, others also archaic, “not very funny”

Rolling Stone was one of several media outlets to post a bad review of Jon Stewart’s new Apple TV + series, suggesting the comedian’s latest venture was outdated and archaic.

“The Problem with Jon Stewart,” Rolling Stone writes, includes too much reference to his popular former show “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart,” now hosted by comedian Trevor Noah. The show features extended Stewart dives and a panel on serious political issues.

“What Stewart continues to invoke The daily show, both explicitly and with many of his creative choices, will be a feature rather than a bug for those who missed his sardonic voice as he spent the Trump years as a public voice, ”wrote Alan Sepinwall of Rolling Stone in an article titled “The Problem with Jon Stewart Review: New Show Stuck in the Past.”

“But the problem with Jon Stewart is that he hasn’t changed since the last time we saw him swing in front of Bruce Springsteen in his Daily show final, when the world has done it – both on and off TV, ”Sepinwall continued.

JON STEWART “SURPRISE” IN MELTDOWN FOR BELIEVING IN THE THEORY OF CORONAVIRUS LABORATORY LEAKS

The reviewer claims Stewart didn’t know how to balance the severity of his subjects – the health of veterans, the COVID-19 pandemic, etc. – with a touch of humor, suggesting that his jokes often didn’t land or seemed out of place.

Overall, Sepinwall wrote that Stewart was below his level in trying to compete with his comedic rivals who have grappled with these issues for the past six years while on the sidelines. Stewart left “The Daily Show” in 2015, amid the stormy GOP primary eventually won by future President Donald Trump.

AUSTIN, TX – OCTOBER 28: Host Jon Stewart at “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart” covers the Austin Midterm Elections with “Democalypse 2014: South By South Mess” at ZACH Theater on October 28, 2014 in Austin, Texas. (Photo by Rick Kern / Getty Images for Comedy Central)

The New York Times, which published a review not as biting as that of Rolling Stone, was nevertheless disappointed with Stewart’s new project.

“In its first two episodes, its show is ‘The Daily Show’ but longer (around 45 minutes), more sustained and passionate in its attention and less funny – often intentionally, sometimes not,” wrote James Poniewozik of The Times.

JON STEWART PUSHES THE CORONAVIRUS LAB LEAK THEORY AS FIRST RETURN GUEST ON ‘LATE SHOW WITH STEPHEN COLBERT’

Poniewozik praised Stewart for raising awareness of the plight of veterans and other important causes, but, like Rolling Stone, suggested that the comedian’s humor often falls flat.

“The first monologue hits pockets of wan laughter – maybe the audience didn’t know what to expect, maybe they were shaken by the contrast between the dark subject matter and the punchlines. ‘Either way, that builds momentum. “

The Guardian addressed a similar issue with the show, posting the most blunt headline of the three, “Criticism of the Issue with Jon Stewart – Raging Just But Not Very Funny”, calling it “a little boring”.

The Washington Post’s Inkoo Kang criticized the show’s lack of humor – “I didn’t laugh once during the two 45-minute episodes shown for review” – and warned him that his “noble” activities might not find an audience without “a few jokes to raise the debate.”

“Much of the left-wing public, I think, continues to scold with their Jersey-centric worldview, reflective self-deprecation and sneering sarcasm. Having been a longtime fan, I’m just grateful to Stewart that we ‘ I have so many other alternatives for him now, ”she wrote.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

When he’s not making jokes on TV, Stewart advocates for 9/11 victims and first responders still struggling with illnesses since the 2001 terrorist attacks. In 2019, the comedian traveled to Capitol Hill to criticize Congress for failing to ensure that a victims’ compensation fund set up after the attacks never runs out of money.