Alex Jones: Infowars host is responsible for damage caused by false allegations about Sandy Hook shooting, judge says



[ad_1]

Judge Maya Guerra Gamble on Monday issued default judgments against Jones and his outlet for failing to comply with court orders to provide information on the lawsuits brought against him by the parents of two children killed in the shooting .

The rulings, which were first reported by The Huffington Post, effectively mean Jones lost the business by default. A jury will meet to determine how much it owes the plaintiffs, according to the report.

Parents’ attorney, Mark Bankston, told CNN in a written statement that the rulings gave his clients “the closure they deserve.”

He added: “Mr. Jones has had ample opportunity to take these lawsuits seriously and to obey the rule of law. He has chosen not to, and now he will face the consequences of this decision. . “

Jones falsely claimed that the December 2012 shooting in Newtown, Connecticut was a “giant hoax” carried out by crisis actors on behalf of people who oppose the Second Amendment.

The shooter killed 26 people at school – 20 of whom were young children – before committing suicide.

Alex Jones says

Several families of the victims sued Jones for libel in Texas and Connecticut courts.

The Texas judge essentially ruled that Jones and his parent company, Free Speech Systems, “intentionally disobeyed” court orders when they failed to deliver certain documents related to the lawsuits against him.

“The Court finds that the non-respect of the defendants (…) is considerably aggravated by [their] consistent pattern of discovery abuse in all similar cases pending in this Court, ”Gamble wrote in one of his decisions. the rules.”

Alex Jones says
In 2019, Jones admitted the shooting was real during an affidavit he gave in a libel case brought against him by the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
Jones’ attorney Brad Reeves declined to comment when contacted by CNN on Thursday, but a statement posted on Infowars by attorney Norm Pattis said the court rulings were “astonishing.”

“It does not take into account the tens of thousands of documents produced by the defendants, the hours spent sitting for depositions and the various affidavits filed in these cases,” the statement said. “We are shocked by what we see as a flagrant abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. We are determined to ensure that these cases are heard on the merits.”

CNN’s Taylor Romine and Kari Pricher contributed to this report.

[ad_2]

Source link