[ad_1]
On Tuesday, the Senate rejected the non-binding Green New Deal resolution proposed by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, DN.Y., and Senator Ed Markey, D-Mass., With 42 Democrats, and Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Voting "present" rather than signing their names to what is most likely the most radical, dangerous and destructive policy proposed for decades.
The leader of the Senate minority, Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., organized the "present" vote of the Senate Democrats, an astonishing decision considering that more than 100 congressional Liberals have already approved the proposal. , including Senators Cory Booker, DN.J., Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.
While it may seem at first sight that Democrats are moving away from the Green New Deal, do not be fooled. The loose decision of the Senate Democrats to refuse to vote for their own proposal is nothing more than a political coup to confuse moderate voters, Democrats will have to get support by 2020.
SEN. TED CRUZ: GREEN NEW DEAL PROMESS TO DESTROY THE AMERICAN INDUSTRY OF ENERGY AS WE KNOW
The Green New Deal would eliminate almost all carbon dioxide emissions from the United States in 10 years by ending electricity generation from coal, natural gas and oil; the replacement of each of the 260 million gasoline cars on US roads with much more expensive electric cars; and to impose "upgrades" for every home and business building in the country – not only for energy efficiency, but also for "comfort", "safety" and the "Affordability".
Instead of using low-cost coal, oil and natural gas, Americans would be forced to pay for the construction and maintenance of hundreds of thousands of wind turbines and solar panels, which provide energy unreliable at a considerably higher cost.
The Green New Deal would not only have destroyed 3.4 million jobs in the energy sector, but at least, millions of others would probably be exported abroad if GND had mandate to end the use of fossil fuels in all US industries, including the entire industry. manufacturing sector and agriculture.
To achieve the objectives of the Green New Deal, it would destroy hundreds of thousands of acres of land and potentially kill hundreds of millions of birds, which would make the Green New Deal disastrous for the environment .
And that's just the beginning. The Green New Deal includes dozens of other socialist provisions, many of which have absolutely nothing to do with energy or climate change. For example, the Green New Deal would create a single-payer health care system, guaranteeing federal jobs, offering employment even to people "reluctant to work", basic income programs, a massive new regulatory system, a system of public banks. and promise "economic security" and universal access to healthy food.
In total, the Green New Deal could cost up to $ 94 trillion in the first decade, according to the American Action Forum. To put this shocking figure in perspective, this represents more than four times the current national debt, which amounts to $ 22 trillion. Even if the Democrats confiscated every penny of every billionaire on the planet, they would not even pay 10% of the cost of the Green New Deal.
Despite the economically destructive and environmentally toxic policies of the Green New Deal, Democrats have largely supported the proposal. Why, then, do they choose to run away now?
The extremist wing of Democrats has resulted in the rest of the party more left than it has ever been, and party leaders know that tens of millions of US voters Identify as independent or moderate democrats are not willing to come out of the socialist cliff with the rest of them. If the Democrats voted openly in favor of the Green New Deal, it would make these candidates virtually inescapable in some parts of the country, including the major turning states. If they voted against it, the party's more radical Liberals would surely try to drive out the most reasonable members of Congress in 2020, creating a major conflict within the party.
The Democrats' plan by election day will be to support the Green New Deal among far-left voters, while distancing themselves from the more radical elements of the plan when addressing the moderates. In other words, the Liberals and Democratic Socialists of the Democratic Party will lie to the moderates to improve their chances in 2020, knowing that if they took power in the next elections, they used it to spend as much of the Green New Deal as possible.
The Green New Deal is not about saving polar bears or ending climate change, but about socialism. If the purpose of this plan was really to stop the "catastrophic" warming of the planet, the Democrats would not lose a penny of effort to try to implement their many socialist policies. If the world is about to end because of climate change (this is not the case), why then would we be interested in a program to create universal access to healthy food or free middle School?
More importantly, the Democrats know that nothing we do in the United States will reduce the current level of CO2 emissions in the world. The rest of the world is increasing its CO2 emissions at such a high rate that it will more than offset the carbon dioxide reductions that we will have achieved in America over the next decade.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
That said, it's easy to understand why the Green New Deal would be politically disastrous, especially in the Midwest and other more moderate regions of the country that Democrats will have to convince in 2020 to beat President Trump.
So, for the moment, Democrats will continue to confuse and mislead voters, while serenely telling their most radical supporters of the left that they are dedicated to worshiping at the altar of the world. Climate alarmism.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE JUSTIN HASKINS
[ad_2]
Source link