Mark Zuckerberg proposes to regulate the political debate and the debate on immigration

by



[ad_1]

Facebook CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, said in an interview this week that the political discussion on social media, including the debate on immigration, should be regulated in order to fight against the 39, foreign influence.

In one Hello America Interview with George Stephanopoulos on Thursday, Zuckerberg said: "All the laws governing political advertising today focus primarily on a candidate and an election, so," Vote for this candidate in this election. "But this n & rsquo; Was not seen Russia trying to do it as well as other people who were trying to interfere in the elections. And we saw them talking about conflicting political issues. "

"They have simultaneously run different campaigns on social media to try to advocate for immigration or against immigration. And the goal was not really to move the issue forward. It was just to annoy people and create divisions. But the current laws on political advertising do not consider the talks as a political affair, "he continued. "So this is one example among others where, you know, it's not clear to me, after a few years of work on this, that we want a private company to make that kind of fundamental decision in Regarding: is the political speech? And how should this be regulated?

"Basically, we would say that setting the rules of political advertising is not a societal job, right? I mean, there were a lot of rules in the past. It's just that at this stage they are not aware of the modern threats we are facing, nor of the types of modern nation states that are trying to interfere in reciprocal elections, "said Zuckerberg. "We need new rules, right? It is not, you can not say that an election is just a while before people go to vote. I mean, the kind of information operations that these people are trying to do is ongoing, permanently. So I think we need new rules on this. Now, at Facebook, we are doing our best on each of these issues. But I think that, ideally, you would have standards to which you would like all major companies to comply. "

After Stephanopoulos replied: "You already see the FCC stand firmly enough against this, two commissioners, I think, have said," No, we do not want to get into the field of keeping the order of the first amendment, "replied Zuckerberg. , "I do not think that's what it is, is not it? I think you can say that kind of regulation on what someone says online is protected. But I think it's clearly not correct today. "

FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr responded to the interview in a message posted on Twitter.

"Facebook is launching a new expanded call to the government for it to monitor your online speech, in an interview with @GStephanopoulos. He asks that your speech on "division" issues – including immigration posts – be regulated by the government as "campaign advertising", he said, "No thanks."

FCC Chief of Staff Matthew Berry also criticized Zuckerberg's proposal, noting that "the role of the government is not to regulate our discussion of" conflicting political issues. "

The editor-in-chief of the reason, Nick Gillespie, commented: "Really terrible – Zuckerberg talks about regulating" political speech "- all speeches (commercial, artistic, etc.) should be free, but especially political speeches."

Charlie Nash is a journalist for Breitbart Tech. You can follow him on Twitter, or like his page on Facebook.

[ad_2]

Source link