[ad_1]
A year after becoming the first seed 1 in the history of the NCAA tournament to fall to a 16-seed, the Virginia Cavaliers seek to complete the story of ultimate redemption. They will have their chance Monday at 21:20. And at US Bank Stadium in Minneapolis when they play Texas Tech, three seeded players, in the 2018 NCAA National Championship Championship Game. The clutch shot and the top-ranked defense are the distinctive marks of the two programs and l & # 39; one will win his first national title in the history of the program. The Cavaliers are the favorites of 1.5 points in the last Virginia / Texas Tech rating after the line fell to -1. The total number of points scored is 118, making it one of the lowest in the history of championship games, as these teams have a slower pace and defensive defense. Before making your own choice between Virginia and Texas Tech, start predicting the predictions of the 2019 March Madness Championship games from the proven SportsLine university basketball model.
This model, which simulates 10,000 times each game, has reported the winnings to those who follow his choices. Over the last two years, the SportsLine projection model has raised more than $ 4,000 to $ 100 worth of players among its top college basketball choices. He went into the playoffs with an 11-5 record of the best players. He was perfect in the 2018 NCAA Tournament, citing Auburn's huge surprise against Kentucky in Elite 8 and scoring 14 Sweet 16. Anyone who followed is up.
Now, the model has figured the numbers for Texas Tech against Virginia. We can tell you that the model is tipping, but it has also generated a contrarian choice that hits well over 50% of the simulations. This choice is only available at SportsLine.
The model knows that Virginia has more talent than what the Cavaliers are credited with. Known for his elite defense and his meticulous style at the offensive, UVA has at least two legitimate hopes from the NBA in De "Andre Hunter (14.9 points per game), which is widely projected as a choice of Lottery potential in the NBA 2019 project, and leader Ty Jerome (13.5), which is also considered a possible first-round pick.
In addition, Kyle Guy, who has just hit three of the most played free throws in the history of the NCAA tournaments in Saturday's Final Four thriller against Auburn, has been torrid in the last two games, averaging 20 points and 6.5 rebounds in Elite Eight and in the final. . He also shot at least 42% of the field in both wins. This trio, plus a team of experienced players, gives Virginia the best talent. Combined with Tony Bennett's system and a strong concentration on defense, the Cavaliers have all the assets to cut the net on Monday in the NCAA 2019 tournament match.
But that 's not because the Cavaliers have an upscale defense that they will cover the Texas Tech vs. Virginia gap on Monday.
The model also knows that no team is as popular as the Red Raiders, who have won 14 of their last 15 games and have covered 11 consecutive teams against winning teams. Texas Tech, which ranks first in terms of defensive efficiency, has limited to 58 points or less four of its five opponents of the 2019 NCAA tournament, and has just harassed the state of Michigan at 31, 9%, from the ground since the beginning of the Spartans season.
Top scorer, Jarrett Culver, was held 10 points in the national semifinal, but senior Matt Mooney tied his season record with 22 points as he eliminated four of eight points to three. While the last three UVA victories were decided at five points or less, the Red Raiders' closest call was a six-point win over another favorite, Gonzaga.
Texas Tech (31-6) runs when it matters most. In the second half against the Spartans, Texas Tech scored 38 points in just 30 possessions, thus continuing to be impressive.
Who wins Texas Tech against Virginia? And which side of the spread strikes more than 50% of the time? Now head over to SportsLine to see which side of Texas Tech vs. Virginia you should be in, the model that has crushed his college basketball picks, and find out.
[ad_2]
Source link