[ad_1]
A CNN report on a recent study on the perceived values of "thoughts and prayers" following a disaster calls into question the moral value and effectiveness of prayer for suffering aliens.
The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, was conducted among religious and non-religious people personally affected by Hurricane Florence in 2018. The methodology used in the study, led by Linda Thunström and Shiri Noy, included the assignment of money funds. value to the thoughts and prayers of religious leaders and "Christian strangers".
The approximately 400 study participants in North Carolina were also paid, according to the report. The study revealed that Christian participants attributed high values to the thoughts and prayers of priests and strangers, but that atheists did not do so. Some participants even suggested paying money to strangers so that they do not send them their thoughts and prayers as a result of a disaster.
"The last result is surprising because we could expect atheists / agnostics to be indifferent to people who pray for them – why worry about it, if you do not believe in the gesture?" Thunström said atheists and "non-religious" participants. "But this is not what we see – atheists and agnostics are opposed to prayers, inasmuch as they are willing to refrain from money to make sure Do not get a prayer from a Christian stranger, so it's important to think about who the target person is who sends thoughts and prayers as a result of difficulties. "
After publishing the report Tuesday morning, CNN has been the subject of intense criticism from many netizens, who said CNN appeared to condemn the positive thoughts and prayers addressed to people in difficulty after a disaster.
"I've never heard a conservative or religious person use his" thoughts and prayers "other than through compassion and authenticity," wrote a Twitter user, pointing out the potential political implications of studying and making report. "I've never heard a progressive or atheist use it in any way other than sarcastic and vitriolic."
I have never heard a conservative or religious person use his "thoughts and prayers" in a way other than compassionate and genuine. I have never heard a progressive or atheist use it in ways other than sarcastic and vitriolic.
– Phil (@philthatremains)
September 17, 2019
"Well now we will REALLY pray for them!" proposed journalist Mollie Hemingway. "Thank you, CNN, for the reminder."
"Please, pray for @cnn," commented the Texas senator on Twitter.
[ad_2]
Source link