A think tank warns the United States against a $ 56 billion export ban



[ad_1]

NEW YORK – The US Department of Commerce's plan to expand export controls on emerging and fundamental technologies in the name of national security could significantly harm the economy, said Monday a think tank based in New York. Washington.

US companies could lose $ 14.1 billion to $ 56.3 billion in export sales over the next five years and create between 18,000 and 74,000 jobs at risk, the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation has announced . ITIF is a research institute specializing in technologies and policies.

"Imposing export controls is hurting US companies by reducing their sales and thus their ability to reinvest their profits in R & D that allows them to continue to innovate and create high-paying jobs," Caleb said. Foote of IFIT, co-author of the report, in a press release. "The US export control regime should be established to protect the interests of US national security without endangering the competitiveness of the United States in emerging technologies."

The Commerce Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The report was released the week after the Ministry's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) added Huawei to its list of entities, forcing US companies to obtain licenses with "presumption of refusal "before being able to export controlled technologies to the Chinese telecom equipment giant. According to Qualcomm, Micron Technology, Western Digital and Qorvo, deliveries to Huawei have already been halted, according to Nikkei.

Google also said that it was complying with the US order, which could lead Huawei to no longer have access to new versions of offers such as Gmail and Google Maps.

According to the report, the technologies that can be restricted include those for artificial intelligence and machine learning, biotechnology, microprocessors, data analysis, navigation, logistics, robotics and the advanced monitoring. IFIT fears that the imposition of export controls on these technologies, which potential US adversaries may still acquire elsewhere, will hurt sales while jeopardizing US competitiveness.

"Although the US government has the right to take action to prevent the use of defense-related technologies by potential adversaries, the BIS must be cautious when applying controls at the same time." export to emerging technologies, "says the report, which calls for a focus on" product exports but also on technology transfer ".

And instead of creating an excessively large network with export controls, the BIS should develop restrictions "to target as precisely as possible specific military technologies, while assessing the potential for coordinated international action, which is essential for effectiveness of any export control regime.

[ad_2]

Source link