[ad_1]
A joint report from the parties in a $ 68 million lawsuit also sets out Amazon's next investigation into alleged sexual misconduct by Allen.
For years, Hollywood has marveled at Woody Allen's ability to attract exceptional talent in his films. Is this still the case? This is a question that could now be asked in the $ 68 million lawsuit against the company for terminating a multi-image deal.
Allen's lawsuit claims "no legitimate motive" for rescinding an agreement based on an old allegation of sexual abuse on his daughter, while Amazon responded that her decision was "justified," highlighting the comments. Allen on the rise of the #MeToo movement, claiming that these statements were made impossible to promote his films.
On Friday, both parties presented the case in a joint report to a New York court.
The report includes investigations that Allen and Amazon's camp plan to conduct during the discovery phase of the case.
Allen wants to explore Amazon's launch and development of its motion picture distribution business. He claims in his lawsuit that Amazon was the beneficiary of an association with him.
Amazon explains that discovery topics will include Allen's statements regarding #MeToo's movement and Allen's allegations of misconduct. Although this is not explicitly stated, this may involve statements from the Allen family.
The digital giant adds that he wants to discover the declared refusal of actors, actresses and other members of the film industry to work with Allen. Amazon may attempt to argue that Allen's performance under the contract was reduced prospectively by comments such as Harvey Weinstein's situation was "very sad for all involved" and "You do not do not want this to lead to a witch-hunt atmosphere. "
In a motion to dismiss several of Allen's claims, Amazon quotes a Vox horizon tour of actors in the entertainment industry who reportedly said they did not work with the filmmaker: Judd Apatow, Haley Atwell, Cate Blanchett, Rachel Brosnahan, Michael Cain, Timothee Chalamet, Colin Firth, Greta Gerwig, Kathy Griffin, Rebecca Hall and David Krumholtz, Griffin Newman, Rosie O Donnell, Ellen Page, Freida Pinto, Natalie Portman, Peter Sarsgaard and Mira Sorvino.
Each of these people may soon receive a request for a statement.
Since Amazon is only asking for the rejection of certain claims, unless a settlement, it seems quite likely that the discovery will take place at some point.
The joint report also goes beyond the revocation petition by announcing what will almost certainly be one of Amazon's main defenses in this case, namely that Allen did not go out of his way. failed to "mitigate the damage". Although this is not stated in the document, Amazon may blame Allen for not apologizing for his comments or for failing to seek alternative funding for his unrealized films.
According to Amazon, Allen and his production company "effectively deny their obligation to mitigate the alleged damages and seek instead to recover the costs of producing films that may never be realized and which, if any, would be financed by some thirds. "
[ad_2]
Source link