AMD says its Ryzen 3000 is not only cheaper, it's better



[ad_1]

Promotional image for new AMD devices.
Enlarge / AMD has provided infrared photos showing its new Ryzen 3700x running cooler than an Intel i7-9700k.

AMD's new line of Ryzen 3000 desktop processors will benefit from the same 7-nm manufacturing process as the company's new GPUs. Most people in the tech community are fighting for the biggest and most formidable player: the Ryzen 9 3950x with 16 cores and 32 threads. But there is a whole new range from 499,350 USD to 199,300 USD, which is relatively modest, and AMD is trying to provide Intel with all the steps.

I do not think people buy an Intel processor after using [launch the Ryzen 3000 line].

Travis Kirsch, Director of AMD Customer Product Management

What's really interesting is that, this time, AMD is not content to offer cheaper parts and "pretty good" performances – the company claims exceptional statistics, as well as gains in terms of thermal and energy efficiency. The Ryzen 9 3700x is priced at $ 329, while the Intel i7-9700k is currently available for around $ 410. But according to the AMD slides, the Ryzen part far surpasses the performance of the i7-9700k, consumes less energy and produces less heat. Even when comparing absolute flagship processors, the monstrous 16-core / 32-wire Ryzen 3950x features 135W TDP, while the 32-threaded i7-7960x processor runs on a 165W TDP.

If the data here is reasonably accurate, the savings in power and cooling costs over the lifetime of a system will likely exceed its already lower purchase price.

One thing remains constant in the Intel vs AMD wars: it appears that Intel will still benefit from a small advantage in terms of single-thread performance, while Ryzen will run away laughing with Benchmark gains massively multithreaded because of its greater number of identical threads. price points. (For example, the Ryzen 3700x has 24 threads on the simple 8 of the i7-9700k.) This usually has little or no help for game tests, which tend to block single-threaded performance and enjoy very little more than four processor threads – but AMD has found a way to shine all those extra threads into a game benchmark anyway.

Of course, you do not need a ton of discussions to play effectively ... but what if you want to play and broadcast in high resolution simultaneously? "Src =" https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/1919/4
Enlarge / Of course, you do not need a ton of discussions to play effectively … but what if you want to play and broadcast in high resolution simultaneously?

Next Horizon Gaming AMD e3 slide series

The Intel i7-9700k 8-wire processor or the AMD Ryzen 9 3700k will play Tom Clancy's Division 2 in 1440P at 90fps effortlessly … but according to AMD data, actually diffusion the live experience is a totally different story. Ryzen has 16 ridiculous additional threads for simultaneous video compression. Admittedly, AMD offers here a compression of very high quality and very high speed that may or may not be strictly necessary for a game flow – but it is certainly desirable, and what is possible tends to establish the norm for this who is expected.

More importantly – for those of us who want to play games even if we do not play them – this also suggests an extremely improved gaming experience on a "box at all". Such a configuration may have email clients, web browsers, anti-virus, and so on. executed in the background.

For those of you who are already fans of AMD, the news is even better: the new product line still uses the AM4 socket, and the company says you can expect that the CPUs Ryzen 3000 continuously replace existing Ryzen CPUs – no motherboard. exchange necessary.

[ad_2]

Source link