[ad_1]
The big picture: The German hardware retailer Mindfactory has published its sales and CPU sales figures, and they show that for a year, AMD has sold a few more units than Intel – until the arrival of Ryzen 3000. When the new equipment was launched in July, AMD's sales volume doubled and its sales tripled from 68% to 79% market share and 52% to 75% share. income – this concerns a single large hardware retailer in Germany – ventilation is very interesting to watch nonetheless.
While I do not want to be vindictive, even though I think it's a good time for schadenfreude, Mindfactory's numbers give a hilarious twist to recent comments from Intel sales development director Troy Severson. "I'm going to be very honest, very straightforward, but they've done a great job of reducing the gap, but we still have the industry's best-performing processors for gaming and we're going to maintain that advantage." "
Credit at its true value, the i9-9900K is incredibly powerful. The difference is that for Intel, the 9900K and 9700K are the two supports of the range, while the Ryzen 9 3900X generated their combined revenue in July. AMD has dominated the last two months in Germany.
Disclaimer: German markets have always been more Ryzen oriented than US markets, and AMD sales will drop a little before stabilizing, while Intel's already seems to have plateaued. We rarely get a detailed view and breakdown of sales data like that published by Mindfactory, which represents part of the German distribution network. To put things in perspective, in Amazon US, the top 25 most sold processors include 9 Intel processors, the rest being made entirely of Ryzen.
Some interesting points to note about the sales volume chart: a large part of the market seemed to be dormant until the exit of Ryzen 3000, so that it seems to be a favorite of long-term buyers .
Surprisingly, sales of Ryzen 2600X and 2700 did not decline with the new version, while sales of 2600 and 2700X did. Ranked, AMD's most popular models are the 3600, 3700X, 2600, 3900X and 2600X models. The most popular Intel are the 9900K, 9700K and 9600K.
The revenue figures are fascinating and demonstrate that Intel has been able to produce high-end processors that could be more cost-effective than AMD options so far. AMD's most powerful options are slightly more cost-effective than Intel's. However, because of the less profitable 3600 and 2600 solutions, Intel's parts are on average more profitable.
We can also explain why AMD decided to transfer Threadripper's 12- and 16-core configurations to Ryzen: Threadripper would seem to be a revenue stream of no consequence. This has generated just as much revenue as AMD's small Picap APUs, which is quite curious because AMD does not market them and did not send review samples. There seems however to be a significant demand for the less expensive 12-core Ryzen.
It is clear that AMD's Pinnacle Ridge components (Ryzen 2000 series) continue to be an essential part of their sales, effectively replacing the low-end Ryzen 3000. Intel operates in much the same way with Coffee Lake, especially the 8700K, which continues to appeal to customers.
While Intel processors remain a good buy in many circumstances and will continue, rightly, to sell well, what is really exciting is that Intel finally has an undeniable equivalent in the world of processors. AMD is undoubtedly in a hurry to assert its benefits and Intel's leaders are fighting hard to develop an answer, the future is bright.
[ad_2]
Source link