Appeals court accepts Trump taking military money for border wall



[ad_1]

A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that a lower court was wrong to prevent the Trump administration from levying $ 3.6 billion on military construction projects for a border wall.

THE JUDGE ORDERS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TO STOP DEPORTING UNACCOMPANIED MINORS AMONG THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC

A panel from the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals said El Paso County and the nonprofit Border Network for Human Rights did not have the authority to challenge President Donald Trump’s redirect funds from over 100 military construction projects, including a $ 20 million highway project at a base in the city.

The appeals court found that neither the county nor the Border Network proved that it was directly harmed by Trump’s decision. The court overturned a decision made in December 2019 by U.S. District Judge David Briones.

A construction worker paints part of a border wall in Mission, Texas on Monday, November 16, 2020. President-elect Joe Biden will face immediate pressure to keep his promise to stop construction of the border wall.  (AP Photo / Eric Gay)

A construction worker paints part of a border wall in Mission, Texas on Monday, November 16, 2020. President-elect Joe Biden will face immediate pressure to keep his promise to stop construction of the border wall. (AP Photo / Eric Gay)

Trump took an estimated $ 6 billion from military funds in a national emergency he declared in early 2019 after Congress refused to fully fund his demands for the wall, resulting in the most long government shutdown in history.

President-elect Joe Biden has pledged to end this national emergency, although the Trump administration has locked construction contracts with the funding and already built many new sections of wall across the southwest border.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

The United States Supreme Court has already agreed to review a different decision on the use of military construction funds. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals previously agreed with a coalition of border states and environmental groups who argued that the money transfer was illegal and that building the wall would pose environmental threats.

In its Friday order, the 5th Circuit said it disagreed with the 9th Circuit’s decision and would “refuse to follow it”.

[ad_2]

Source link