Apple defends its removal of clothing-breaking apps from the App Store



[ad_1]

With the growing ubiquity of smartphones in everyday life, it's unsurprising that users are forming bad habits and even addictions with their devices that ultimately affect their mental wellbeing.

In response, there was a number of developers making apps to limit an individual's phone usage, even tech giants such as Google have introduced similar features for their own products, but a recent report from The New York Times suggests that Apple has been combating these services in its App Store.

Anti-competition?

Apple is another tech giant Screen Time function view its release in iOS 12, but the Times' report suggests that the Cupertino firm has made it very difficult to run a competing app for the iPhone.

"Over the past year, the most downloaded screen-time and parental-control apps", the report reads. "Some app makers with thousands of paying customers have shut down. Most others say their future are in jeopardy. "

When speaking with the developers of the affected apps, the Times' noted that the "executives at the app makers believe they are being targeted for their apps could hurt Apple's business. Apple's tools, they add, are not as aggressive and do not provide as many options. "

Apple's response

Apple's vice president of marketing, Phil Schiller MacRumors The solution to the problem is that it has been fundamentally unsecured for their users.

The apps used Mobile Device Management (MDM) in every action on their iPhone, a technology that has been designed to be used for their own use.

The system would allow the developers of such monitoring devices to have access to their devices, know their location, track their app use, control their mail accounts, web surfing, camera use, network access, and even remotely erase their devices ", According to Schiller's response.

Apple, on learning of the misuse of MDM technology, has been employed by the developers who have been employing it in order to ask them to stop, according to Schiller, it does not mention explicitly what actions have been taken after that.

While it is well-known that Apple prides itself on its users' security, it's understandable why developers are seeing the timing of the removal of their competing addiction-breaking apps as suspicious.

[ad_2]

Source link