[ad_1]
A new report from the group Intergovernmental expert on climate change (IPCC) shows that greenhouse gas emissions from human activities are responsible for a global warming of 1.1 ° Celsius from the period 1850-1900 to the present day.
More alarming is the fact that, among other things, the IPCC report states that by 2030 (a decade earlier than they said in 2018) the average temperature of the planet will be around 1.5 ° C higher than the levels of the pre-industrial era. time.
This assessment is based on data sets collected by all climate scientists around the world.
“This is another of the lies of socialism,” Milei said.
However, the libertarian economist and candidate for the Argentine deputation Javier milei denied the existence of a climate change.
“This is another of the lies of socialism, there is a whole agenda of cultural marxism. 10, 15 years ago we said that the planet was going to freeze, now we say that it is warming. Those who know how to do these simulations will see that the functions are saturated in certain parameters on purpose to generate fear, ”said pity during a live with him youtubeur and actor Julien Serrano transmitted by Twich last August 5.
This is not the first time that the defenders of a neoliberal ideology have taken negationist positions towards the climate crisis. Liberal leaders like the President of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro or the Australian Prime Minister, Scott Morrison, are just a few of them.
Countries in Europe such as France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom have Think tanks disseminators of denial ideas. These are organizations that seek to influence political decision-making directly or indirectly, trying to influence public opinion and the media. Some of them are Center for Political Studies United Kingdom, Molinari Economic Institute in France, and the Juan de Mariana Institute in Spain, among others.
These organizations have in common an ideology neoliberalIn other words, they defend the free market and minimal government intervention and adopt political positions close to political conservationism or even the extreme right. the climate counter-movement that make up these organizations is newly created and relevantly active for less than a decade.
Denial in these countries may be linked to the economic benefit generated by the destruction of the environment. In 2018, the world’s main oil producers, the United States, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, refused to accept the final scientific report that had served as the basis for the negotiations of the Conference of the Parties (COP24, for its acronym in English and its edition number). They were opposed to the acceptance of scientific evidence and therefore to adherence to common guidelines. More than 190 countries gathered in Katowice, Poland, to celebrate the Climate summit in which it was definitely decided when and how to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that would prevent global warming.
In addition, the report of Oxfam, Fight carbon inequalities, released last year, found that the richest 1% of the world’s population was responsible for more than twice as much carbon pollution as the 3.1 billion people who make up the poorest half of the world. ‘humanity. This report was released as world leaders prepare to meet at the United Nations General Assembly and discuss global challenges, including the climate crisis.
The report was based on research conducted with the Stockholm Environment Institute, which assessed the consumption emissions of different income groups between 1990 and 2015, 25 years in which humanity doubled the amount of carbon dioxide in the world. atmosphere.
.
[ad_2]
Source link