The most ambiguous of Dominguez's letter, with a nod on both sides?



[ad_1]

In the middle of a battle at offices, every word can be added from one side or the other to increase the arguments in its favor. River and Bocaduring these hours they play their clbadic away from the playground, and today Alejandro Domínguez, issued a statement that could well be worth a million dollar goal, in which he said: " Conmebol I preside, football is not won with stones or aggression. Theor the players win on the field"

However, a second reading of the leader's statement pays, voluntarily or not, the position of xeneize, which tries to match Saturday's situation with that of the pepper spray of 2015 which resulted in its disqualification.

"Despite the prior agreement of fair play signed by the presidents of the two finalists clubs and all the warnings of Conmebol to security officials, the stadium and its surroundings were the scene of irrational violence and apparently unpunished, vis-à-vis the players, the public, children and families who have approached peacefully, authorities, neighbors, "he said by situating what was happening at the river.

Thus, he would drop the idea that the incidents occurred only outside the security ring, the area in which the millionaire would have greater responsibility and should react harder to all that is happening. goes there. Can Boca use it in their favor?

[ad_2]
Source link