"I wish D & # 39; Onofrio pays me," said the lawyer who defends the woman who surrounded his son with flares – 28/11/2018



[ad_1]

Carlos Broitman is a high level lawyer. Ibar Pérez Corradi, the pharmaceutical entrepreneur, had been sentenced to seven years in prison for disproportionately introducing ephedrine into the country between 2004 and 2008, an operation discovered after General Rodríguez's triple crime. He was also the legal representative of Henry de Jesús López Londoño, aka My blood, the Colombian drug trafficker arrested in Argentina, extradited to the United States and sentenced to 30 years in prison. And the signatures continue … But on Monday, he took charge of an affair that took a public state and sparked popular outrage amidst the battle of the Copa Libertadores: She stood at the forefront of the defense of the woman who surrounded the body of her nine-year-old son with flares.

A woman attaches flares to her baby at the entrance to River Stadium.

A woman attaches flares to her baby at the entrance to River Stadium.

Why Broitman, lawyer for big shots, took the case of a woman from "Lower middle clbad", as recognized by the lawyer himself? Who paid the fees? Do you have a link to the River Brave Bar?

The questions that are jostling around this cause find answers in the words of Broitman, who speaks hand in hand with Clarin. And a complaint against Adriana Bellavigna: "The prosecutor ignored the evidence of the corruption that existed on Saturday and the way people went to court. There were checks that received money in exchange for access. Everything is filmed on the mobile phone of my client's husband"Broitman stated that his client was subjected to "Pressures" to plead guilty and sign an abridged trial.

– He drew attention to the fact that you, a serious and exposed business specialist lawyer, took charge of the case.

-In the first place, I only deal with the causes that I defend. If they do not call me, no matter how media they are, I do not mean it. In my study, we handle 300 criminal cases. But on Sunday, the brother of one of my daughter's best friends contacted me. He told me that the ex-wife had a big problem. In fact, I was playing cards and I missed the subject of flares. Now, when I saw it, it hit me. I do not agree with a woman who surrounds her son with explosives. I told this man: "Augustine, I can not take this cause." And I cut it. He reminded me and said: "We trust you, my family knows you". I know the boy since he was a child at school parties. Now I have insisted: "Agustín, if the girl puts the child's life in danger, I will not defend her."

-But he went to the defense.

-Because they had no chance to blow up the flares. She grabbed a knife, drilled a hole, wet the contents and let it dry. It was harmless. She considers herself "Cristinista" and I wanted to show that there was no security. He had the idea of ​​entering the field, lifting the shirt towards the son and raising a sign with the caption: "There is no security in River except in the G-20." She works in a company and her husband has a gym. They do not have social plans. They pay profits. They are partners and have no connection to the River Bar.

– Who pays for it?

-I would like to be paid (Rodolfo) of Onofrio … I took the case because I knew the ex-husband thanks to my daughter's relationship with his sister.

Broitman stated that Bellavigna had pressured her client: "She was forced to spend 24 hours in detention, she recognized the flares, said they were harmless and even explained how she bought them, With a credit card, it was a peaceful demonstration that he wanted to do.A witness said that she also had a sign similar to the one she was going to show. agree on a probation. "Later, the husband called me scared, crying.They told him that the psychological report had gone wrong and that they were going to get his children out. he did not plead guilty. & # 39; I sign any thing & # 39;she said. I did not consent. When we appear before the judge, he himself repealed the abridged one. We held a disqualification hearing and the report was now going very well. Why does the prosecutor not close the bars? They cover everything to hide the most serious problem, the bar. "

The woman was sentenced to two years and eight months in prison, which will not be effective. Home sets and must submit to the control of the Council of the Liberated, to a psychological treatment and will have to abstain from participating with his youngest child in a sporting event of great scale. In addition, he will perform 48 hours of community service to the state in a public good entity.

Meanwhile, the prosecution is using to identify people who threw stones, stones, bottles and destroyed the bus that went to the Boca campus. And still there is not a single detainee …

[ad_2]
Source link