After the La Rioja decision, the Rosada fears a "delivery" of reelections in the provinces of the opposition – 25/01/2019

The government has not hidden its disappointment by the decision of the Supreme Court around the referendum to allow an amendment allowing the governor of La Rioja, Sergio Casas, present for reelection

In the oficialismo, they hastened to warn that the failure of the Supreme Court is a feeling ugly previous this could allow "the holding of re-elections" of other governors.

In Cambio, we compared Sunday's vote with the experience of Carlos Rovira in Misiones, in 2006, he called a referendum for an indefinite re-election and was defeated by Msgr. Joaquín Piña. "The attempt to reelect 8 governors has been stopped", they evoked.

They also refused to allow the executive power to be dealt with double rod to judge the re-election attempt of Governor Río Negro, Alberto Weretilneck. Sergio Wisky, a reference on macrista in this province, compared the two situations and said that at least the people of Rioja had the choice between a consultation. In the government, few would prefer a warrant to Weretilneck before the mayor of General Roca, Martin Soria.

However, over the hours, in Cambio, we preferred to make a more optimistic reading of the sentence and to emphasize the fact that the Court he did not declare himself incompetent, as in the case of Santa Cruz and the law of slogans. At Casa Rosada, they urged to win the vote on Sunday to settle the dispute.

"The Court's decision can not be interpreted as a validation of Governor Casas' gross intention to re-elect himself, and the Court admitted that the judgment fell within his original jurisdiction. 39; amparo could agree, but most considered that it was premature, because there was no consolidated case, "said radical jurist Ricardo Gil Lavedra, who defends the ruling party's position before the court.

In this way, Cambiemos could again appeal to the Court if it obtained an adverse result.

Radical Senator Julio Martinez and Peruvian-born Rioja Mayor Alberto Paredes Urquiza, who are fighting to be candidates for Change in the Governor's election, were in tune.

"Although the Supreme Court did not give birth to the amparo, it will act, be attentive and wait for the results if the amendment is completed or not." We think it is important the Court's suggestion to the local judge to ensure transparency"Said the former defense minister.

The direction of Cambiemos warned by the "Clientelist device" Casas and broadcast videos of the distribution of pockets of foods and goods in Chilecito and other places.

He also insisted on the impossibility of prosecutor supporters To count the votes, they emphasized the technical objections to the "no" and the near impossibility of replacing them in the dark room.

No referent expects the Superior Court of La Rioja to rule against Casas. "It's a dependent justice"they claimed.

In the Casa Rosada claimed a victory without appeal Sunday beyond any legal interpretation. They refer to the controversy raised by Cambiemos before the Supreme Court for the interpretation of Article 84 of the Rioja Constitution.

Peronism aims to count only the votes of the "No", which should add 35 percent of the motif. Let's change interpreter what are the votes for the "Yes" those who should add this percentage.

With the decision of the La Rioja court, another worrying issue in Balcarce 50 was again evident: the solitude of the President of the Court, Carlos Rosenkrantz, who returned to vote for dissent and wanted to make room for it. amparo.

"In fact, he still failed (Horacio) Rosatti who opens the question by allowing the fair and after a requested peronist turns around", they evaluated in the judicial table of the executive.