The DAIA tried to hide the blow | He said no …



[ad_1]

The DAIA has issued a statement that it "does not intend to waive the complaint of the MoU with Iran", but will submit the matter to the vote of its affiliated entities. Thus, he rejected the letter of the president of the AMIA, Agustín Zbar, who on Thursday enjoined the DAIA to withdraw from the charge brought against the former president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, as it was a political accusation related to crack. outside the Jewish community on the side of change. As expected PáginaI12, the president of the DAIA, Jorge Knoblovits, had already convened a meeting for May 6, during which institutions affiliated to the DAIA, including the AMIA, will vote on the criterion to follow.

The letter of the AMIA caused a sharp commotion and dealt a very hard blow to the complaint filed at the time by the prosecutor Alberto Nisman. He disavows this accusation by pointing out that it was a political maneuver, which was "a serious mistake" in the conduct of the DAIA and which actually placed him on the side of Macrismo. It should be considered that DAIA did not play a pbadive role in the trial but even accompanied the treason charge against CFK and the late former Foreign Minister, Héctor Timerman. Even when there were detainees – Timerman himself incarcerated at home, Carlos Zannini, Luis D Elia, Jorge Khalil and Fernando Esteche remaining imprisoned – the DAIA had endorsed this whole process and when Timerman died, he was born. Did not even make a gesture of accompaniment. of any kind. He was the first Jewish Chancellor in the history of Argentina.

In the statement, the DAIA played to not be distracted by the AMIA, in an already strong internal conflict within the Jewish community. The confrontation is such that the AMIA throws the DAIA of the Pasteur building 633 into a deplorable show for any community. The DAIA statement contains a section that reflects this situation: "We do not know why AMIA, one of the more than 120 DAIA-affiliated entities, has given the issue a public status." A united Jewish community open to dialogue, respecting the responsibilities and missions of the institutions ".

It seemed sung that the DAIA could not be intimidated by the AMIA. That's why he says that he will not give up the quarrel, but that will be seen later. It is obvious that the PRO hawks within the DAIA have put all the pressure for the paragraph to appear as follows: that is, the intention is to maintain the complaint. But the truth is that the issue was already under discussion before this week's scandal. The end result is unknown because it is difficult to estimate who will get the most votes at the badembly on May 6, especially because the AMIA letter blew things up. The impression was that the withdrawal of the complaint was about to have a majority, but now the pressures will be maximum. To make matters worse, a decision will be made already in the heat of the election campaign and the PRO members who were community leaders will play their chips. The DAIA was openly on the side of change and some of its executives are now part of the government: MP Waldo Wolff, who was vice-president of the DAIA; Patricia Bullrich's husband, Guillermo Yanco; Secretary of the Environment, Rabbi Sergio Bergman and Secretary of Human Rights Claudio Avruj. Even the Minister of Economy, Nicolás Dujovne, is an active member of the Jewish community.

Beyond the polemics between community leaders, the Memorandum dossier has already been hit hard. It must be remembered that the July 18th attack targeted the AMIA building, even though DAIA was also working on a floor. However, the DAIA was not injured or died, because at 9 o'clock that Monday, there was no one in the offices. That is, whoever requests the withdrawal, who disavows the charge against CFK, is the primary entity affected by the attack.

At the same time, the cause of the memorandum is already in sharp decline. Today 's session is open to trial, orally and after the intervention of Oral Court number 8, after Cambiemos attempted a serious maneuver. Armed with a court finger, the 9th, and ruled that this oral court directed the judgment by the memorandum. The Supreme Court having prevented this maneuver, the drawing of lots was again carried out and the Federal Federal Court was defined 8. The maneuvers did not stop there. DAIA badumed that one of the magistrates was not too supportive and challenged him. In this way, they managed to remove Judge Sabrina Namer from the memorandum case.

Even then, it will be very difficult to advance the prosecution by a treaty approved by both Houses of Congress that has never come into force. They should even blame all MPs and senators, including those who voted against, because they have never claimed that it was a crime. It is obvious that it is not even a question of justice and that, to top it off, it had no legal effect because it had not entered into force. In a grotesque way, the testimony of the key man, former Interpol Secretary General, Ronald Noble, baderted from the first day that the denunciation of the memorandum by Nisman "is false "had been avoided. Of course, they will try to avoid this testimony by accusing Noble of all that is possible, although it is not easy given that he is American and that he was responsible, not less than the secret service of the United States. It seems difficult to be imposed as an agent of Iran or Kirchnerism.

.

[ad_2]
Source link