For a British judge, marital sex is "a right …

An English judge sparked a wave of criticism from activists and politicians who had felt in a ruling that it was "fundamental for the man" to make love with his wife in a controversial case. The case began with a request from social services, who warned that the state of health of the woman in metal was deteriorating and that she was not able to give her consent to have bad, reason for a particular case of violation.

Regardless of the condition of the woman and thinking only of the desire of the man, Judge Hayden determined that "he could not think of a more fundamental right than the right to". a man to have bad with his wife ". To make matters worse, he insisted that it was the state that had to "control" what was happening. The lyrics were part of the first public hearing before the protection court, where an attempt had been made to allow the disabled woman to have the capacity to consent to relationships with her husband.

The man has promised not to sleep with his wife for more than 20 years, given his condition, but prosecution lawyers have lobbied for a court order prohibiting all types of bad to be abused. However, the magistrate's decision surprised everyone: he stressed, on the contrary, that the alleged human right to privacy should be discussed. Quickly social networks were filled with denunciations for their badist statements.

His remarks angered Labor MP Thangam Debbonaire, who said they "legitimized misogyny and hatred". "No man in the UK has the legal right to insist on bad," said the parliamentarian, who spoke about the 2003 Sexual Offenses Act. For her part, her colleague Jess Phillips tweeted: "It is not a basic right to have bad with your wife.It is not even a right. Victim Support Association has also come to the crossroads: "In any circumstance, no one has the right to have bad with you without your consent."