Bureaucratic Protocols – Confidential

Bureaucratic protocols

Orteguismo is a degenerative society process that develops on ignorance, lack of culture and knowledge

The Ortega is not only a dictatorship, that is, it is not only an absolutist state led by a dynastic family, but also a degenerative process of society that emphasizes ignorance, lack of culture and knowledge. technical and humanistic, in the lack of ideology, in the lack of logical thought, in sloppery and demagogy.

Ortega Cultural Damage

Thus, the spontaneous rebellion against the Ortegaisme is also impregnated by the characteristics of the cultural and political backwardness of the Ortegaisme itself, by the lack of method of badysis, by the predominance of a contradictory, incoherent metaphysical reasoning. Divine intervention for the solution of political problems.

This immaturity of the subjective element of transformative political action, this lack of theoretical and scientific coherence, offers Ortega a porous frontier through which he can escape in the event of a desperate strategic situation. And this allows him to conclude agreements that reaffirm the basic elements of Orteguismo itself which, unfortunately, are destined to change by mere will, without strategy of struggle.

Ortega is not subtle, but it is easy for him to find similarities with the weak political and cultural formation of his opponents. Thus, virtually all the agreements signed by the Alliance with Ortega are repudiated by the population, which allows Orteguismo to appear among the lines of the agreements. The Alliance is also accustomed to creating mistrust for never doing what it says.

End of the dialogue with the "style" of the Alliance

The Alliance has ensured that if Wednesday, April 3, the issue of early elections is not on the agenda of the dialogue, the dialogue ends. However, when the deadline arrives, he signs a press release with Ortega in which he badures that they give each other time to reflect on the issues of truth, justice, reparation and non-repetition, as well as only on the point of reference. Strengthening democracy and electoral reforms.

However, it is not a question of strengthening democracy, but of dismantling the dictatorship. In this case, the press release is used exclusively for the demagogy of Ortega.

The press release does not dispute Ortega's refusal to discuss the issue of early elections, the main element of the negotiations, demanded by the nation and the international community.

Does Ortega respect the agreements?

Of course, Ortega wants to spread the message that it will comply in a responsible manner with the agreements signed, although it has totally violated the agreement to strengthen the rights and guarantees of citizens, as well as guarantees of security released people. And the Alliance, instead of denouncing the violation by Ortega of such agreements, signs the press release in which it ensures that they will continue to work together in the government. accomplishment agreements, by developing the required protocols. Are protocols needed to reverse repression?

Let's see On Friday, April 5, Ortega released 50 more political prisoners in the utmost secrecy, without protocol, at his discretion. This is of course a maneuver. By his total desire, Ortega seeks to compensate for the sense of failure of the dialogue, seeking to thwart the report of the OAS that has not advanced a millimeter in the main files. It does not matter that this discretion, this repressive capacity which, with only Ortega want it, conversely, removes the need for protocols, which the Alliance has accepted in the press release.

For some reason, the Alliance continually masks the face of dictatorship. Thus, the dialogue does not end with an ultimatum, as the Alliance insinuated, but, according to the joint press release, in a kind of hypnotic trance of reflection. Who should think and on what?

After the April mbadacre, the political consciousness of the people leapt forward, beyond the dictatorial reality. It's a civic conscience that rejects the brutal reality of the foregaism. Therefore, the dictatorship can not stop repressing brutally, despite agreements on the guarantees of citizens. Therefore, Ortega can not authorize international guarantors. As a result, Ortega is trapped in the paradox of repression, which is deeply biting his tail.

The exclusive contradiction between the libertarian political conscience of citizenship and the dictatorship is what must be resolved in favor of the nation, with an effective political change, and not by agreements.

The dictatorship is a structure of impunity

For the moment, Ortega does not ask that the agreements grant immunity to him and his killers, because his idea is more rude, more rudimentary, more anachronistic.

In the proposal submitted to the negotiating table on Wednesday, April 3, on the issue of truth, justice, reparation and non-repetition, Ortega wanted the Alliance to accept that it be itself, that is to say its police and other institutions. those who investigate the criminal crackdown and the excessive use of police state forces during the April mbadacre (which the agreement signed by the Alliance, of Rights and Guarantees, calls for events happened from April 18th).

For Ortega, the bottom line is that the essence of the dictatorship remains intact. Since an absolutist regime should be responsible to no one. Thus, with impunity guaranteed, immunity becomes a poetry.

Ortega is trapped

Ortega's problem is that the people remain vigilant about the behavior of the Alliance in the negotiations, ready to accuse its members of complicity if they claim to be naive and if they lend themselves to camouflage of crimes against humanity.

It is not that the dialogue is blocked or that there is a surprising way to unlock it at the bargaining table with new participants. The resource of the dialogue, arrived at the principal subjects, shows its insurmountable limits. The democratic transformation of society does not admit of a negotiated solution as long as Ortega is not tactically defeated by a change in the correlation of forces. Who overcomes the dialogue and goes beyond the times, methods and capacity of the Alliance.

Revoking Plebiscite

The democratic transition is not done by negotiated agreements with Ortega. The way out of the crisis is not dialogue, but consultation of the popular will, which never results from consent. voluntary of Ortega, but the fighting pressure, a struggle that isolated him and reduced his ability to govern. The objective circumstances, although threatening for the country, constitute a close link against the dictatorship. The international community also draws the same link.

Ortega, unfortunately, has no political ideology, no confidence in his political abilities, nor the courage to fight programmatically, any more than the strategist, but a mere corrupt bravado, an incompetent boss with ridiculous messianic pretensions.

Ortega is not insightful enough to propose an alternative, in the style that the Pinochet butcher had met in 1988. It is not up to the circumstances and can not replace the arrogant cynicism of the bastard paramilarism all! recall referendum that adapts power to a change in the strategic situation in the democratic sense. That's your strategic weakness.

The essential thing is to push, to force, to force Ortega, with pressures of all kinds, internal and external, so as to impose an urgent democratic consultation. The dialogue must eliminate the dust and the arrangements of an agenda loaded with ortega language, of orteguistas protocols, of secret discussions or ortéguistas, being limited, as only way out of the crisis, to put under the microscope the Requirement for immediate consultation of the popular will through a recall referendum which then allows for an electoral process without Ortega.

Ortega removed from formal power, will possible the true transformation of society, the structure of paramilitaries can be eliminated and transitional justice can be applied so that the crimes of the dictatorship can not be repeated.

* The author is an electrical engineer.