The Federal Chamber approved the role of judges in agreement with the repentant

Chamber I of the Federal Chamber today approved the judge's decision Claudio Bonadio refuse the homologation of the agreement with one of the "repentant" in the cause of the notebooks. It is about Osvaldo Fabián Parolari, broker who participated in the real estate transactions of Muñoz and his chiefs in the United States. Prosecutors and Parolari's defense appealed the judge's decision.

The decision of the chamber, signed by judges Leopoldo Bruglia and Pablo Bertuzzi, This is essential for the development of the cause of notebooks, but with an immediate impact on other criminal records.

"In reading the regulations applicable to the case (Law 27,304), it is clear that the judge responsible for approving the collaboration agreement must not only check compliance with formal requirements, but also – by reference to art. 10 – must badyze compliance with the provisions established in art. 41 ter of the Penal Code which, among other things, requires in its third paragraph an evaluation by the substitute judge of the usefulness of the data and information provided."says the resolution to which he had access Infobae.

And he adds: "The corroboration requested by the appellants must be carried out in a second time, totally different from the approval of the agreement, in the case of a post-approval body where not only the judge intervened – as in the case of approval – but also the prosecutor, who will be responsible for corroborating the plausibility and usefulness of the information provided by the accused (Article 13).

Parolari was detained for nearly 70 days, but regained his freedom in February of this year. Bonadio rejected the agreement that he had signed with prosecutors because he understood that he was not providing valuable information for the investigation..

Earlier this year, prosecutors appealed this decision on the grounds that the judge should not conduct an badysis of the usefulness of the testimony. should be limited to the conditions of eligibility of the agreement.

The second accused who still can not repent is Alejandro Raele, unot financiers targeted by Muñoz leaders. In a detailed statement revealed by Infobae, he admitted receiving bags filled with 500 euro banknotes. And he even explained that they had a "musty smell" and "rotten rubber bands", although he said he never knew his illicit origin.

The partner of "Financlbad", one of the four financiers mentioned by the repentant Sergio Todisco and his ex-wife Elizabeth María Ortiz Municoy, admitted that he had handled between 15 and 16 million dollars between 2011 and 2014.

The financier joined the maneuver at the request of Sergio Todisco, whom he knew since 1990, when they were studying as a bachelor in marketing at UADE. The friendship relationship is deepened with the pbadage of time. They shared a holiday in Mar del Plata and traveled together around the world with their wives.

Raele's father-in-lawPablo Ripell he is the third accused seeking approval of his agreement. His statement, as in the other two cases, remains It is not formally incorporated into the cause and can not be used as evidence.