Naaju Breaking News, Live Updates, Latest Headlines, Viral News, Top Stories, Trending Topics, Videos
[ad_1]
Two previous calls resulted in the preparation of Donald Trump's phone conversation with Mauricio Macri on Wednesday. Both were made by Jorge Faurie. One was held on May 1, when the Chancellor met with his colleague Mike Pompeo and the other has arrived the last Sunday, May 5 also between Faurie and John Bolton, the powerful national security advisor to the President of the United States.
Since he was in a position to know this newspaper in detail, Faurie and the two influential figures discussed a series of burning questions about Argentina, in a way that always seemed to be in a single Washington goal. They want to know for themselves what is the political and economic situation in Argentina in this electoral cycle already begun and in which the Americans do not doubt. The message they gave is that They continue to support Macri to maintain the current architecture of this country against the ghost that lurks even in the markets. Without giving names in public, they say so privately. The return of Kirchnerism to power is for them a return to populism and therefore Argentina comparable to Venezuela.
What you need to know today | The most important news of the day to read in ten minutes
Monday to Friday morning.
On this same tone, they also touched on the theme Macri and Trump in their Wednesday telephone conversation, which was brief and very focused on the economic situation of Argentina before the presidential elections in October. Macri and TrumpThey have this link for a long time.
The fact that the Venezuelan crisis has generated a deep reason for dialogue and alliance with Washington is well known. And that happened from the moment Macri took office at the end of 2015 and that the President of the United States was Barack Obama. Macri is the first president of Mercosur to have raised the voice against the regime of Nicolas Maduro, which at that time still had allies like the former president of Brazil, Dilma Rousseff.
When Donald Trump came to power, the situation remained the same: the isolation of the region of Venezuela was already underway. but today the crisis has changed.
In the overview of the presidents' conversation, Faurie reviewed the bilateral issues with Pompeo. In this May 1 call, they spoke of a possible trip from Pompeo to Buenos Aires for the summit on terrorism to be held here in July; Macri measures to stabilize the triggering of the dollar, and the Argentine economic plan subject to the terms of the million-dollar loan from the IMF. And they reviewed the situation in Venezuela, which in Argentina has two points. The country's own situation and this idea that resurfaced on the markets a few weeks ago that Cristina Kirchner stands in the elections and wins.
In the dialogue with Bolton, Trump's ferocious policy, there was talk of the recent Silk Road summit created by China and attended by Faurie. Beyond what is said and believed by the Chinese, decidedly pragmatic, they show signs of not wanting to anchor on one side or the other before the crisis in Venezuela. Regarding the crisis, a position is adopted today, namely that of the Lima group. Isolation in Maduro, pressure and recognition of the interim government of Juan Guaidó. But nevertheless for what he knows Clarin From sources in Washington on the issue of military intervention or not, there are subtle differences in appreciation. Cuba and Cuba were talked about before the crisis in Venezuela. Faurie returned to Pompeo to take stock of the election campaign in Argentina.
In public, the region is in favor of the negotiated solution and against intervention, unless, of course, Guaidó asks for it, it was said. And also, within the OAS, some member countries indicate that this could happen at dawn.
Source link
