Supreme Court warns of electoral council realignments

After the facts regarding the actions of the Supreme Court this week regarding the cause "Vialidad", in which a former president, Cristina Kirchner, is currently the subject of an investigation, the ministers of the highest court they did an badysis of the strange effects that the crack can produce.

That's how-as you may know Infobae– the judges examined how a measure can be distorted for electoral reasons and how can the pressure come to unite a divided court.

Regarding the first point, it is necessary to make some clarifications: last Tuesday, the judges spoke of the request of the main file of the business "Vialidad" to badyze it. According to indisputable sources consulted by Infobae, none of the ministers talked about suspending the lawsuit. They did not say in the oral court either. This is, in fact, the lawsuit has never been suspended.

The intention was to ask him to badyze it and, from there, opinions diverged among the five. There was no political badysis of the issue and that is why the request was made by a minimal decision, without reason, and signed by a secretary. When the Court makes an important decision, it is well founded and generally made known through numerous press releases.

Thursday, before the huge political reaction, the judges met and wrote a statement to clarify their actions. It was unbelievable for judges and civil servants all that was said from that moment on as a result of the decision made by the Court.

The five ministers spoke between Thursday and Friday. The concern did not concern the accusation by the government of a so-called pact of impunity nor the exaggerations of Kirchnerism as to the consequences of a decision that the highest court of law n & # 39; He had not returned. "The court has never done any madness and will not judge the judges," said an experienced official on the fourth floor of the palace, who added that will only badyze the guarantees of due process, which is its function of constitutional guarantees court.

What worries the five judges the most? Impact of the independence of the judiciary. In this sense, according to what Infobae could know, the statements of Germán Garavano, who spoke of the "political meaning" of the decision, aroused discontent. The judges felt that, at least, this type of badertion is irresponsible on the part of a justice minister.

The call by social networks to cacerolazos to reject the decision of the ministers of the Court was much worse. According to sources consulted, behind these calls to protest, they thought they saw the so-called "trolls". They also exposed public insults and private threats against judges Juan Carlos Maqueda, Horacio Rosatti, Ricardo Lorenzetti, Elena Highton and their families. The president of the court, Carlos Rosenkrantz, also suffered similar suffering, but on the opposite side.

The court will probably continue its internal divisions, but this has linked them to the five people on alert, which should not be ignored by the government, which usually achieves the opposite of what it wants.

The conclusion is that electoral polarization has led many to lose any notion of the Republic and what is important because, in short, whatever the future, a strong court will be needed to set limits, as per the past and probably continue because it is the institutional life of Argentina.

In Republican countries, the decisions of the Court are criticized, but respected, they do not try to modify them by putting pressure on the judges. Who will oppose the next abuses that will surely occur ?, they wonder near a judge of the highest court. The same goes for the rest of the justice system, which seems to be satiating because of the pressures it claims to receive daily. That is why, as they say in the environment of several judges, we will have to pay attention to what a united and firm judiciary will do in the face of pressure.