How Argentina affects the fall of Theresa May in England and Brexit

Theresa May resigned as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Unlike David Cameron, the former Conservative prime minister who resigned in 2016 and who left a song hummed, May shattered in tears when she finished her speech by saying that "I'm in the mood for it!" she had lived "the honor of my life to be the second woman prime minister – but surely not the last to have the opportunity to serve my country that I love" and disappeared behind the gate of 10 Downing Street, where he had briefly described his administration: "to complete the work of his predecessor, build new housing, correct the budget deficit in accordance with the principles of security, freedom and opportunity". Opposition leader, Labor Jeremy Corbyn, said the country was not recognized in May's description.

image1.png

According to a recent UN report, 14 million poor people are severely criticized for adjustment policies, the result of an ideological project aimed at radically changing the relationship between government and citizens. Austerity policies have dramatically increased the number of people living on the streets, the number of people using the dining rooms (food banks), the housing shortage, the significant deterioration of the national health system (NHS) .

"Theresa May is right to resign," Corbyn concluded, "she's now accepting what the country has known for months: she can not govern either herself or her disintegrating party, no matter what new leader Tory has let the people decide the future of our country by an immediate general election ".

The May resignation will come into effect on June 7 and the following week will be replaced by a new leader of his party; There are 16 possible candidates, including former Chancellor Boris Johnson, and intrigues for succession are already underway, which tend to give way to shades and peril of Shakespearian tragedy.

The conservative party has not been able to resolve the UK's departure negotiations from the European Union, in which it has unnecessarily involved the country. David Cameron has decided to make a plebiscite on the UK's permanence in the EU, calling for a referendum demagogically designed as an internal building tool, in order to more easily compete with right-wing Europhobes. Unexpectedly, the majority vote for Brexit was successful and since then, the cascade of errors has greatly aggravated the situation. the EU with more force, under the slogan "Strong and stable" (Strong and stable). The result was unfavorable: he lost many seats in Parliament, he was forced to join an Irish far-right party to form a government. Under these circumstances, the Labor Party made considerable progress.

"Brexit, it's Brexit," simplified the month of May, unable to obtain the results of a negotiation that deserved the approval of Parliament.

The scenario is not the same as when the Brexit was chosen three years ago, when the British did not seem to measure the consequences of the exit from the common market. There was then a strong anti-establishment component, impoverished citizens who saw their internal affairs settle in Brussels and their living conditions in Germany. To the fragmentation of interests within the four nations of the United Kingdom, adds that of the own EU, shaken by the policies of austerity, immigration, Derechización.

The Labor Party, which has opportunistically supported the proposal to remain in Europe with reforms – "Rest and Reform" – does not now choose to call a new referendum, forced to respect the popular will. One can look forward to the triumph of a Labor government in the general election. The Conservative Party, which designed the Brexit referendum as a tactic to strengthen itself, eventually sank under its weight. Something like the evangelical quote "Everyone who wants to save his life will lose it".

With regard to the relationship between the conservative government of Theresa May and the neoconservative government of Mauricio Macri, it can be said that since the time of Roca, no leader has fully represented British interests in Argentina.

On August 2, 2016, Theresa May responded with a letter to Macri's request to vote for former Foreign Minister Susana Malcorra as Secretary-General at the United Nations. In this attached letter, May warns you that the United Kingdom does not usually reveal its vote. But take this opportunity to express your interest in working together to move the relationship to a "more productive" phase. It is pleased that they have already discussed with the Chancellor of Switzerland the intensification of cooperation in the fields of business, investment, the fight against drug trafficking and corruption and the willingness of the Argentina to move closer to the OECD. And in her memo, Theresa May ends up asking Macri directly that, for a "mutual benefit", progress is being made in the progression with "more flights between the Falklands and third countries in the region" and "the suppression restrictive measures concerning hydrocarbons in the islands ".

A few days after receiving this note on Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at midnight, Vice Foreign Ministers Foradori and Duncan signed an agreement. In the chapter on the South Atlantic, the Government of Argentina undertakes to "remove all obstacles to the economic growth and sustainable development of the islands, particularly with regard to hydrocarbons, fishing, trade and navigation. ". In other words, the Argentine government is committed to dismantling all legislative, legal and administrative measures to protect our natural resources in the Falklands.

British ambition was written to the letter, Brazil decided on a flight to the islands, with the express exclusion of Argentine airlines, and May 17, oil areas in the Malvinas' strategic basin have been awarded to companies operating in the Islands by order of the illegitimate island government, consolidating the presence of the usurper in our Falkland Islands.

May and Macri's adjustment governments come to an end. We hope to put an end to the agreements reached behind the Congress, ruinous for the national interest and the defense of our sovereignty.