The dirty campaign is already running at full speed

Then, his main concepts:

• The
  election campaign dirty is based on the
  misinformation, and trying to embed the other. In general this happens when
  the candidates They can not explain their virtues, so they prefer to show that the other is uglier than they are. Sometimes it is a matter of misinformation and sometimes of putting the adversary on the defensive: instead of being able to elaborate his own plan, he has to go out to explain what he has already said.
• In how many
  WhatsApp we're getting today, with videos, memes and more, can you identify who actually created the content? In many cases, it is simply transmitted. And we're not just talking about fans taking quick notes to support their candidates or criticize opposites. Many times, there are campaign teams behind them, professional hands dedicated to badembling this content.
• It is essential to emphasize that beyond the efforts of the campaign teams, the main responsibility lies with the user, as well as during the voting. When you receive something on your cell phone, you must stop, breathe before you hurry to return it. Anyone can check if it's true or not, google, see if this appears in the serious news portals, and so on.
• We go with some examples: it is wrong that the government of Buenos Aires has fined
  River to accommodate people in street situations. It's fake the video that goes around that says that
  Kicillof He said the fields had to be expropriated. That's wrong
  Vidal I said that if teachers want to earn more money, they have to find another job. It is not true that the préfecture and the gendarmerie attacked C5N. That's wrong
  Cristina Kirchner He has a hidden daughter with Down syndrome.
• They throw themselves with anything, everywhere. The bottom line is that when we receive information, think about it and verify that information before sharing it. And the key point is in the feelings. Journalists try to inform rationally, but the one who receives from the other side often reacts with the heart. "You touch someone who likes me or who voted, I reject what you say."
• That said, this kind of dirty campaign sometimes carries a huge risk for the one who drives it. You can get the shot and generate a victimization of the one you want to integrate.
  Donald Trump This was the case in the United States. When, during the campaign, he began to receive attacks, he ended up generating an increase in his hard core and a victimization in the logic of "attacking Trump because Washington came to change." This blinded him and helped him win the election.
• Finally, two recommendations. For citizens: moderation, reflection, evaluation, information. And for the candidates: what happens if they begin to submit proposals, instead of attacking others?