Graciana Peñafort broke a journalist from Clarín during the treatment of Santoro

Lawyer Graciana Peñafort joins Clarín journalist Miguel Wiñazki who defended his colleague Daniel Santoro, who was sued by the judge of Dolores, Alejo Ramos Padilla, in the case relating to the alleged extortion of businessmen in connection with the case Cuadernos.

Wiñazki was referring to Truman Capote's book A Cold Blood, in which the author interviewed two murderers who had killed an entire family. "Fortunately for literature and for the history of freedom, Truman Capote did not have to face a militant judge, in which case he could have been charged with the same crime as Perry …" ", said the columnist Clarín about the suit against Padilla against Santoro.

Peñafort replied that "the discussion is funny, even if it is beautifully written." I ask Miguel Wiñazky what would be his opinion if, before his death, Truman had agreed to interview Perry Smith (one of the murderers ) with his family Clutter (the murdered), because Santoro interviewed, for example, Gonzalo Bruza Dovat (victim of an extortion that Daniel Santoro knew perfectly well, executed D'alessio) with the extortionist D'alessio ".

The lawyer also asked him: "Would an activist judge be the one who would sanction Capote when he declared that he would interrogate the family who would be murdered before his death and knowing that this was his destiny?" had a journalistic interest? "

Daniel Santoro interviewed Bruza Dovat at D'alessio's suggestion Santoro questioned Bruza Dovat, knowing full well that he was extorted by D'alessio. Santoro accepted this interview, while extortionist D'alessio had let him know that his goal was "to soften" the victim. Because Santoro knew that the interview was going to "soften" Bruza Dovat. That's how D'alessio tells him. And so Santoro interviewed, "he argued.

READ MORE

Cristina Kirchner's urgent request to prosecutors

Peñafort also claimed that Santoro was not sued for extortion, as Wiñazki suggested: "Santoro's defense with liars only exonerates Santoro and journalism." Miguel wanted to tell you , for hundreds of reasons, including what I like as you write and I do not like it when you lie, and you have the right to lie in the world, and I must point it out to you. "

The complete thread:

at. I've read an editorial by Miguel Wiñazki about Santoro's treatment in which he begins to refer to one of the best books I've read in my life, namely "A Cold Blood" of Truman Capote. Book based on the interview of two guys who killed an entire family just for killing

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

b. In this note, Miguel Wiñazki states that "Fortunately for literature and for the history of freedom, Truman Capote has not had to deal with a militant judge." In this case, he could have been accused of the same behavior as Perry. "

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

c. The argument is funny even when it is written nicely. I ask Miguel Wiñazky what would be his opinion if, before his death, Truman had agreed to interview Perry Smith (one of the murderers) with the Clutter family (the bruised)

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

d. Because Santoro interviewed, for example, Gonzalo Bruza Dovat (victim of extortion that Daniel Santoro knew perfectly well, was executing Dalessio) with extortionist D'alessio.

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

e. Would an activist judge be the one who would punish Capote if he declared that he would question the family who would be murdered before his death and knowing that this was his fate, had a journalistic interest?

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

f. But what would have happened if Perry Smith and Capote had chatted before the interview of the murdered family and that Perry had told Capote that he needed Capote to interview the Clutters to "soften" them, so that he would not have to. they accepted his death without defending themselves?

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

f. But what would have happened if Perry Smith and Capote had chatted before the interview of the murdered family and that Perry had told Capote that he needed Capote to interview the Clutters to "soften" them, so that he would not have to. they accepted his death without defending themselves?

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

g. This is precisely what happened when Daniel Santoro interviewed Bruza Dovat at D'alessio's suggestion. Santoro questioned Bruza Dovat knowing perfectly well that D'alessio had extorted him. Here dialogues pic.twitter.com/fqHztOjASk

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

h. Santoro accepted this interview, while extortionist D'alessio had let him know that his goal was "to soften" the victim. Because Santoro knew that the interview was going to "soften" Bruza Dovat. That's how D'alessio tells him. And if Santoro interviewed

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

i. If Truman Capote had agreed to interview members of the Clutter family to "soften", accept their deaths and not defend themselves, any judge will say that Truman Capote is part of the criminal maneuver. Because it would have been

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

j. Miguel, your argument is a trap. It's a liar argument. Even when it is written nicely. Your argument misleads those who read you and does not tell the truth. Santoro is being prosecuted for interrogating an extorted person. Situation that Santoro knew

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

k. And not only was Santoro aware of the extortion inflicted by Brusa Dovat and for which he was going to sit by his side, but he had agreed to interrogate them, knowing that the purpose of this interview was to & # 39; & quot; soften & quot; the victim. Sweeten that he should conclude with Bruza Dovat testifying before Stornelli

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

l. Between Truman Capote and Daniel Santoro, there is an abyss. Truman Capote is not part of Clutter's murder, he did not know it was going to happen and he also did not write notes for them to accept his death.

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

m. Another of the victims of Daniel Santoro wrote in a great note that I highly recommend Miguel, https://t.co/A4pTHh9uaN pic.twitter.com/QoxxdsqI4w

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019

not. Santoro's defense with liars has just sacked Santoro himself and journalism. Miguel wanted to tell you, for hundreds of reasons, including that I like the way you write and that I do not like when you lie. And you have every right to lie, and I must point that out to you.

– Graciana Peñafort (@gracepenafort) August 10, 2019