Bolsonaro would lose with Haddad today | The desap has grown …

From Brasilia

If the atypical elections of 2018, when Lula was banned, were again organized, Jair Bolsonaro would get 36% of the valid votes and would be defeated by Fernando Haddad, of the Workers' Party, with 42%, according to a poll published by the daily St. Paul's Folha. On October 28, the retired captain defeated with 55.1% of the 44.8% of Haddad, the former president's ward, whose candidacy had been barred by Judge Sergio Moro, of the same. time, and by members of the Federal Supreme Court. who was under the aegis of an "advisor" of the army, who served as political commissioner.

Moro would be rewarded a few days after the elections by being appointed Minister of Justice and Public Security.

In the Datafolha survey known this Monday describes the disappointment of the electorate. in front of an accidental president that some badysts of the mainstream press already consider as a candidate for the dismissal.

After eight months of government, 38% of respondents disapproved of the military, which means a five-point rejection greater than that measured in the July survey. While 29% have a "good" image, that is four points less than two months ago.

These are the figures of a possibly unimaginable bankruptcy of the perpetrators of the coup that overthrew Dilma Rousseff in 2016 and, in April 2018, he imprisoned Lula to put a definitive end to the political project petista.

According to Datafolha, this is the most unpopular government at the beginning of the mandate, the last 24 years. When Lula had eight months in power, his negative image was 10%. During the same period, Dilma was rejected by 11 points and Fernando Henrique Cardoso by 15%.

The plot that Bolsonaro felt in the fourth floor office of the Plbadto left aside an indisputable fact of the Brazilian political reality: the right and far right have given birth to no capable leader to win democratic elections. They could not be imposed in 2002 and 2006 against Lula, nor in 2010 and 2014 against Rousseff. And they were marching towards the fifth defeat in 2018 when the former turner had forty percent of the voting intentions against twenty of the paratroopers of the far right.

From this coup d'etat based on the conservative voluntarism of judges, armed forces and the media – with Washington's blessing – a figure appeared as the interim president who stands out for his denial of the truth.

In the morning of today, for example, he refuted the study that compared him to Santa Claus. A month ago, he wanted to hide the statistics of deforestation in the Amazon by referring the physicist who headed the National Institute of Space Research.

He accused the world of being a victim of "environmental psychosis" shortly before the start of the fires that devastated the Amazon.

Despite the fiction built by the president and his environment, the concrete fact is that between January and August, his popular support dropped by more than forty percent. Datafolha showed that only evangelical voters and far-right supporters, such as those who threatened a Pará reporter, would vote for reporting on the "Fire Day" plan in which thousands of hectares of this Amazonian state were burned.

This madness escape already worries the members of the armed forces and part of the conservative camp that has propelled it to power.

In this context, an army sector would no longer be worried about Lula 's release, unlike what happened last year when his prison was not there. negotiable, he wrote. Folha.

If finally Chief Petista leaves the Federal Police Supervisory Commission in Curitiba, which may happen this month, the Plbadto will have a new headache.

It turns out that the former president is able to arouse the discontent of the currents of opinion with the regime that failed to revive the economy, is about to reform the pension system, has not reduced unemployment by 13%, threatens the Bolsa Familoia and reduces the University budget

And that's not all, the 73-year-old veteran politician had already anticipated his intention to take stock of the elections contaminated by the false news and even questioned the veracity of the stabbing suffered by the army of the time that had changed the course of the campaign.