[ad_1]
A New Jersey couple in the United States filed a lawsuit against a fertility clinic where he turned to conceive his daughter; "Asian Traits" this does not correspond to theirs, local media reported on Friday.
The couple used the services of the Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Science at the St. Barnabas Medical Center in Livingston, New Jersey after the failure of her pregnancy. The parents gave birth to a girl after opting for artificial insemination through in vitro fertilization.
When the child is growing up and is two years old, parents notice that their daughter has developed "Asian Traits" counted the couple's lawyer, Dave Mazie. A DNA test performed on the miner revealed that the husband did not share biological traits with his daughter and that the father was of Asian descent, Mazie told the chain. ABC 7.
The news has so affected the couple that they have divorced because of the stress generated by the mistake. For this reason, on August 28, the parents filed a lawsuit against the clinic in order to obtain financial compensation, saying that they loved their daughter, but the mistake of the clinic was their caused a lot of pain and suffering, reported the agency EFE.
The plaintiffs, who spent more than $ 500,000 on fertility treatment, denounced the clinic for fertilizing her egg with the sperm of a man who was not her husband, according to court documents.
In addition, they are trying to find out who is the biological father of the girl, now six years old, because she suffers from a blood disorder badociated with Southeast Asia, of which the couple is not a carrier.
"She's still her daughter, they love her, she's six now."Mazie added about parents who divorced because of the "voltage" caused by this alleged negligence.
The non-biological father, who remained "Devastated" For the conclusion, he continues to visit the girl but will wait to reveal its origin, while demanding to know if his sperm was used to conceive a child.
A judge of the Esbad County Superior Court ordered the clinic to provide a list of men and women who received treatment on the same dates as this couple, around November 2012.
The clinic 's lawyers argue that the publication of the information would be a violation of the law, but the judge says that the personal information to identify a person could be removed from the list, but not those of the doctor. man to identify.
.
[ad_2]
Source link